D.E. Marple-Horvat
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark A. HollandsDavid M. ArmstrongRichard AppsMark WilsonMark ChattingtonNadia L. CerminaraJohn SteinJosé María Criado
- Topics
- Vestibular and auditory disorders (16 papers)Motor Control and Adaptation (15 papers)Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
D.E. Marple-Horvat
43 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 788
- Neurology 439
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 374
- Social Psychology 258
- Biomedical Engineering 255
Countries citing papers authored by D.E. Marple-Horvat
This map shows the geographic impact of D.E. Marple-Horvat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.E. Marple-Horvat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.E. Marple-Horvat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.E. Marple-Horvat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.E. Marple-Horvat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.E. Marple-Horvat. The network helps show where D.E. Marple-Horvat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.E. Marple-Horvat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.E. Marple-Horvat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.E. Marple-Horvat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.E. Marple-Horvat. D.E. Marple-Horvat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 65 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 103 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About D.E. Marple-Horvat
D.E. Marple-Horvat is a scholar working on Neurology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (16 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (15 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (374 citations), Neurology (439 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (788 citations). D.E. Marple-Horvat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Hollands, David M. Armstrong, Richard Apps, Mark Wilson, Mark Chattington, Nadia L. Cerminara, John Stein, José María Criado, Andrew Amos and Derek Ashford. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Neuropsychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.