Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer
2000811 citationsThomas Reilly, Jens Bangsbo et al.Journal of Sports Sciencesprofile →
A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer
2000744 citationsThomas Reilly et al.Journal of Sports Sciencesprofile →
Talent identification and development in soccer
2000664 citationsThomas Reilly et al.Journal of Sports Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Reilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Reilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Reilly more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Reilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Reilly. The network helps show where Thomas Reilly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Reilly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Reilly.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Reilly based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Reilly. Thomas Reilly is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Reilly, Thomas. (2011). Science and football : proceedings of the First World Congress of Science and Football, Liverpool, 13-17th April 1987. Routledge eBooks.1 indexed citations
Drust, Barry, et al.. (2010). International research in science and soccer : the proceedings of the First World Conference on Science and Soccer. Routledge eBooks.2 indexed citations
5.
Reilly, Thomas. (2009). HOW CAN TRAVELLING ATHLETES DEAL WITH JET-LAG?. University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 41(2). 128–135.12 indexed citations
Wallace, Joanne, et al.. (2009). Body composition of international- and club-level professional soccer players measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Journal of Sports Sciences. 27.
Reilly, Thomas, et al.. (2006). Seasonal changes and physiological responses : their impact on activity, health, exercise and athletic performance : review article. International sportmed journal for FIMS. 7(1). 16–32.3 indexed citations
12.
Reilly, Thomas. (2003). Aspectos Fisiológicos del Fútbol.13 indexed citations
Reilly, Thomas, et al.. (1997). Science and football III : proceedings of the Third World Congress of Science and Football, Cardiff, Wales 9-13 April 1995.3 indexed citations
18.
Reilly, Thomas, et al.. (1995). A multivariate analysis of kinanthropometric profiles of elite female orienteers.. PubMed. 35(1). 59–66.3 indexed citations
Reilly, Thomas, Jan Pieter Clarys, & Arran Stibbe. (1993). Science and football II : proceedings of the second world congress of science and football,Eindhoven, Netherlands, 22nd-25th may 1991.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.