Nick Glozier

18.1k citations
313 papers · 12.1k indexed · 4 hit papers · h-index 59

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Glozier

303 papers receiving 11.8k citations

Hit Papers

Prevalence of PTSD and common mental disorders amongst ambulance personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2018 · 248 citations
2482011202620162021200400600

Peers

Nick Glozier
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Applied Psychology 1.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.6k
  • Biological Psychiatry 337
Replace Daniel E. Ford with:
Daniel E. Ford United States
Arnstein Mykletun Norway
Serge Brand Switzerland
Dan I. Lubman Australia
Markus Gerber Switzerland
Wolfgang Herzog Germany
Annemieke van Straten Netherlands
David M. Almeida United States
Joshua M. Smyth United States
Ulrich John Germany
Nick Glozier relative to Daniel E. Ford United States Daniel E. Ford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Daniel E. Ford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Glozier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Glozier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Glozier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Glozier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Glozier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Glozier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Glozier. The network helps show where Nick Glozier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Glozier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Glozier Line = papers co-authored together Nick Glozier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20246
3 20247
4 20242
5 20241
6 20231
7 20238
8 20235
9 20230
10 20226
11 202225
12 20222
13 202119
14 202113
15 202117
16 20218
17 202054
18 202019
19 20198
20 20177

About Nick Glozier

Nick Glozier is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 313 papers that have together received 12.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (56 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (49 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (44 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (40 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (32 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (31 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (23 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.6k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (337 citations). Nick Glozier has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian B. Hickie, Adam J. Guastella, Helen Christensen, Anne Masi, Samuel B. Harvey, Sharon L. Naismith, Nathaniel S. Marshall, Liesje Donkin, Ronald R. Grunstein and Rafael A. Calvo. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry, BMJ Open, Occupational Medicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026