Elizabeth Stratton

878 citations
24 papers · 491 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Elizabeth Stratton

21 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Stratton
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Psychology 136
  • Clinical Psychology 181
  • General Health Professions 179
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
  • Social Psychology 88
Replace Leonard J. Haas with:
Leonard J. Haas United States
Sonja Gilbert Finland
Judy Wu Canada
Thomas G. Kimball United States
Luigi Janiri Italy
Li Peng China
Melissa K. Weinberg Australia
Stephanie Smith United States
Megan Whitehead United States
Inga Truskauskaitė‐Kunevičienė Lithuania
Elizabeth Stratton relative to Leonard J. Haas United States Leonard J. Haas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.3×
Leonard J. Haas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Stratton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Stratton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Stratton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Stratton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Stratton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Stratton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Stratton. The network helps show where Elizabeth Stratton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Stratton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth Stratton Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth Stratton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017182
2 202063
3 201540
4 202127
5 202225
6 201924
7 202119
8 201819
9 201514
10 202113
11 202412
12 201710
13 20209
14 20208
15 20226
16 20226
17 20236
18 20214
19 20202
20 20231

About Elizabeth Stratton

Elizabeth Stratton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers), Marine animal studies overview (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (136 citations), Clinical Psychology (181 citations), General Health Professions (179 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations) and Social Psychology (88 citations). Elizabeth Stratton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nick Glozier, Isabella Choi, Samuel B. Harvey, Rafael A. Calvo, Amit Lampit, Jennifer Taylor, Loyola McLean, Anthony Korner, Susan E. Peters and John Torous. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, PLoS ONE, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact