Debi Roberson

4.6k total citations
54 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Debi Roberson is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Debi Roberson has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 19 papers in Social Psychology and 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Debi Roberson's work include Categorization, perception, and language (35 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (24 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (17 papers). Debi Roberson is often cited by papers focused on Categorization, perception, and language (35 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (24 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (17 papers). Debi Roberson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Debi Roberson's co-authors include Jules Davidoff, Ian Davies, J. Richard Hanley, Laura Shapiro, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Maria Gendron, Hyensou Pak, Mariko Kikutani, Ljubica Damjanovic and Nick Braisby and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Current Biology and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Debi Roberson

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Debi Roberson United Kingdom 23 1.8k 913 731 267 122 54 2.5k
Dermot Lynott United Kingdom 21 998 0.6× 739 0.8× 484 0.7× 344 1.3× 70 0.6× 57 1.7k
Louise Connell United Kingdom 24 1.3k 0.7× 921 1.0× 708 1.0× 492 1.8× 101 0.8× 65 2.0k
Diane Pecher Netherlands 29 1.4k 0.8× 1.3k 1.5× 1.4k 1.8× 906 3.4× 106 0.9× 78 2.7k
Barbara Kaup Germany 24 1.1k 0.6× 736 0.8× 973 1.3× 764 2.9× 213 1.7× 93 1.9k
David A. Robertson United States 9 625 0.3× 517 0.6× 631 0.9× 543 2.0× 124 1.0× 15 1.4k
David H. Rakison United States 25 488 0.3× 610 0.7× 649 0.9× 1.2k 4.4× 62 0.5× 60 1.8k
Merideth Gattis United Kingdom 19 308 0.2× 993 1.1× 694 0.9× 908 3.4× 94 0.8× 49 1.6k
Peter Walker United Kingdom 23 1.0k 0.6× 480 0.5× 1.0k 1.4× 474 1.8× 17 0.1× 70 2.0k
Ezequiel Morsella United States 18 544 0.3× 624 0.7× 1.2k 1.7× 408 1.5× 97 0.8× 73 1.9k
René Zeelenberg Netherlands 27 904 0.5× 831 0.9× 1.4k 1.9× 652 2.4× 42 0.3× 71 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Debi Roberson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debi Roberson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debi Roberson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debi Roberson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debi Roberson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debi Roberson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debi Roberson. The network helps show where Debi Roberson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debi Roberson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debi Roberson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debi Roberson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debi Roberson. Debi Roberson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoemann, Katie, Alyssa N. Crittenden, Qiang Liu, et al.. (2018). Context facilitates performance on a classic cross-cultural emotion perception task.. Emotion. 19(7). 1292–1313. 23 indexed citations
2.
Lewis, Jennifer, Debi Roberson, & Tom Foulsham. (2017). The impact of facial abnormalities and their spatial position on perception of cuteness and attractiveness of infant faces. PLoS ONE. 12(7). e0180499–e0180499. 6 indexed citations
3.
Kikutani, Mariko, et al.. (2016). Cultural Influences on the Structure of Emotion: An Investigation of Emotional Situations Described by Individuals from Cambodia, Japan, UK and US. 6(1). 20–26. 3 indexed citations
4.
Li, Peng, Jiayi Li, Zhonghua Hu, et al.. (2015). Reduced sensitivity to neutral feedback versus negative feedback in subjects with mild depression: Evidence from event-related potentials study. Brain and Cognition. 100. 15–20. 12 indexed citations
5.
Hu, Zhonghua, J. Richard Hanley, Ruiling Zhang, Qiang Liu, & Debi Roberson. (2014). A conflict-based model of color categorical perception: evidence from a priming study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21(5). 1214–1223. 17 indexed citations
6.
Cinel, Caterina, Riccardo Poli, Luca Citi, & Debi Roberson. (2013). An exploration of the effects of audio-visual entrainment on Parkinson's disease tremor. 14. 1562–1565. 3 indexed citations
7.
8.
Hanley, J. Richard & Debi Roberson. (2011). Categorical perception effects reflect differences in typicality on within-category trials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 18(2). 355–363. 33 indexed citations
9.
Kikutani, Mariko, Debi Roberson, & J. Richard Hanley. (2010). Categorical Perception for Unfamiliar Faces. Psychological Science. 21(6). 865–872. 16 indexed citations
10.
Roberson, Debi, J. Richard Hanley, & Hyensou Pak. (2009). Thresholds for color discrimination in English and Korean speakers. Cognition. 112(3). 482–487. 56 indexed citations
11.
Roberson, Debi & J. Richard Hanley. (2009). Relatively speaking: what is therelationship between language and thought in the color domain?. Open Access at Essex (University of Essex). 1 indexed citations
12.
Davidoff, Jules, et al.. (2008). Knowing color terms enhances recognition: Further evidence from English and Himba. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 102(2). 219–238. 36 indexed citations
13.
Roberson, Debi & J. Richard Hanley. (2007). Color Vision: Color Categories Vary with Language after All. Current Biology. 17(15). R605–R607. 29 indexed citations
14.
Roberson, Debi, Hyensou Pak, & J. Richard Hanley. (2007). Categorical perception of colour in the left and right visual field is verbally mediated: Evidence from Korean. Cognition. 107(2). 752–762. 134 indexed citations
15.
Roberson, Debi, et al.. (2005). Color Language and Color Cognition: Brown and Lenneberg Revisited. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 1 indexed citations
16.
Russo, Riccardo, et al.. (2005). Mood-congruent free recall bias in anxious individuals is not a consequence of response bias. Memory. 14(4). 393–399. 20 indexed citations
17.
Roberson, Debi, Jules Davidoff, Ian Davies, & Laura Shapiro. (2004). The Development of Color Categories in Two Languages: A Longitudinal Study.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 133(4). 554–571. 89 indexed citations
18.
Roberson, Debi, Jules Davidoff, Ian Davies, & Laura Shapiro. (2004). Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology. 50(4). 378–411. 243 indexed citations
19.
Roberson, Debi, Ian Davies, Jules Davidoff, et al.. (2002). Theories, Technologies, Instrumentalities of Color:Anthropological and Historiographic Perspectives. University Press of America eBooks. 5 indexed citations
20.
Roberson, Debi, Jules Davidoff, & Nick Braisby. (1999). Similarity and categorisation: neuropsychological evidence for a dissociation in explicit categorisation tasks. Cognition. 71(1). 1–42. 101 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026