Kate Rhodes
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- James W. FawcettDaniela CarulliRichard AsherLawrence MoonClare GaltreyTadahisa MikamiSathyaseelan S. DeepaJunko Fukuda
- Topics
- Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (10 papers)Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Kate Rhodes
20 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
- Cell Biology 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 868
- Developmental Neuroscience 596
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 444
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Rhodes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Rhodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Rhodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Rhodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Rhodes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Rhodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Rhodes. The network helps show where Kate Rhodes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Rhodes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Rhodes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Rhodes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Rhodes. Kate Rhodes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 168 | |
| 6 | 138 | |
| 7 | 117 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 96 | |
| 11 | 300 | |
| 12 | 75 | |
| 13 | 278 | |
| 14 | Professional Java Tools for Extreme Programming: Ant, XDoclet, JUnit, Cactus, and Maven | 3 |
| 15 | 135 | |
| 16 | 75 | |
| 17 | 236 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 177 | |
| 20 | 477 |
About Kate Rhodes
Kate Rhodes is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (10 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (596 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Cell Biology (1.1k citations). Kate Rhodes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James W. Fawcett, Daniela Carulli, Richard Asher, Lawrence Moon, Clare Galtrey, Tadahisa Mikami, Sathyaseelan S. Deepa, Junko Fukuda, Kazuyuki Sugahara and Kevin R. Oliver. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.