Ngoc B. Pham
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Organic Chemistry
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ronald J. QuinnWilson S. MengAnthony R. CarrollGregory K. PierensSorel MureşanUsama Ramadan AbdelmohsenTanja GrkovicSrikkanth Balasubramanian
- Topics
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers)Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers)
- Cited by
- BiotechnologyPharmacologyToxicology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ngoc B. Pham
22 papers receiving 680 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Molecular Biology 327
- Pharmacology 185
- Organic Chemistry 143
- Biotechnology 121
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 110
Countries citing papers authored by Ngoc B. Pham
This map shows the geographic impact of Ngoc B. Pham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ngoc B. Pham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ngoc B. Pham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ngoc B. Pham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ngoc B. Pham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ngoc B. Pham. The network helps show where Ngoc B. Pham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ngoc B. Pham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ngoc B. Pham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ngoc B. Pham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ngoc B. Pham. Ngoc B. Pham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Hydrogel Dressings for Chronic Wound Healing in Diabetes: Beyond Hydration. | 6 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 105 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 109 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 143 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | Building A Drug-Like Natural Product Library | 5 |
| 20 | 23 |
About Ngoc B. Pham
Ngoc B. Pham is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (121 citations), Pharmacology (185 citations) and Toxicology (25 citations). Ngoc B. Pham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronald J. Quinn, Wilson S. Meng, Anthony R. Carroll, Gregory K. Pierens, Sorel Mureşan, Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen, Tanja Grkovic, Srikkanth Balasubramanian, Ute Hentschel and Tobias A. Oelschlaeger. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.