Nesa E. Wasarhaley

527 total citations
24 papers, 300 citations indexed

About

Nesa E. Wasarhaley is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Nesa E. Wasarhaley has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 300 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Gender Studies, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Nesa E. Wasarhaley's work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (14 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers). Nesa E. Wasarhaley is often cited by papers focused on Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (14 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers). Nesa E. Wasarhaley collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nesa E. Wasarhaley's co-authors include Jonathan M. Golding, Kellie R. Lynch, Peggy S. Keller, Anne Lippert, J. Matthew Webster, Megan F. Dickson, Claire M. Renzetti, Jennifer A. Jewell, Will M. Gervais and Sierra A. Bainter and has published in prestigious journals such as Sex Roles, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Criminal Justice and Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Nesa E. Wasarhaley

22 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nesa E. Wasarhaley United States 12 151 141 84 65 60 24 300
Narina Nunez Nightingale United States 7 86 0.6× 83 0.6× 186 2.2× 153 2.4× 31 0.5× 9 297
Jennifer L. Matheson United States 8 86 0.6× 91 0.6× 53 0.6× 59 0.9× 19 0.3× 16 245
Jennifer Groscup United States 8 52 0.3× 107 0.8× 85 1.0× 46 0.7× 96 1.6× 18 263
Tonya Lippert United States 7 63 0.4× 91 0.6× 264 3.1× 83 1.3× 10 0.2× 9 344
Karin Arbach Argentina 10 26 0.2× 242 1.7× 242 2.9× 60 0.9× 32 0.5× 42 378
Alec M. Smidt United States 7 156 1.0× 159 1.1× 74 0.9× 64 1.0× 23 0.4× 11 299
Monica L. P. Robbers United States 9 34 0.2× 200 1.4× 124 1.5× 26 0.4× 14 0.2× 11 275
Stans de Haas Netherlands 10 158 1.0× 136 1.0× 143 1.7× 86 1.3× 13 0.2× 13 355
Jeff A. Bouffard United States 10 53 0.4× 327 2.3× 157 1.9× 29 0.4× 13 0.2× 23 390
Allison C. Aosved United States 7 245 1.6× 183 1.3× 113 1.3× 143 2.2× 8 0.1× 15 411

Countries citing papers authored by Nesa E. Wasarhaley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nesa E. Wasarhaley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nesa E. Wasarhaley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nesa E. Wasarhaley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nesa E. Wasarhaley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nesa E. Wasarhaley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nesa E. Wasarhaley. The network helps show where Nesa E. Wasarhaley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nesa E. Wasarhaley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nesa E. Wasarhaley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nesa E. Wasarhaley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nesa E. Wasarhaley. Nesa E. Wasarhaley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., et al.. (2019). More Than Skin Deep? The Effect of Visible Tattoos on the Perceived Characteristics of a Rape Victim. Women & Criminal Justice. 30(2). 106–125. 2 indexed citations
2.
Brown‐Iannuzzi, Jazmin L., Jonathan M. Golding, Will M. Gervais, et al.. (2019). Will jurors believe nonbelievers? Perceptions of atheist rape victims in the courtroom.. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. 13(1). 119–126. 6 indexed citations
3.
Lynch, Kellie R., et al.. (2017). Great Sexpectations: The Impact of Participant Gender, Defendant Desirability, and Date Cost on Attributions of a Date Rape Victim and Defendant. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 35(17-18). 3437–3461. 13 indexed citations
4.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E. & Jonathan M. Golding. (2017). Ageism in the courtroom: mock juror perceptions of elder neglect. Psychology Crime and Law. 23(9). 874–898. 2 indexed citations
5.
Golding, Jonathan M., Kellie R. Lynch, Nesa E. Wasarhaley, & Peggy S. Keller. (2015). Courtroom Perceptions of Child Sexual Assault. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 42(7). 763–781. 8 indexed citations
6.
Golding, Jonathan M., et al.. (2015). Improving the Credibility of Child Sexual Assault Victims in Court: The Impact of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 33(4). 493–507. 19 indexed citations
7.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., Kellie R. Lynch, Jonathan M. Golding, & Claire M. Renzetti. (2015). The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Legal Perceptions of Lesbian Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 32(5). 635–658. 11 indexed citations
9.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., et al.. (2014). Mock Juror Gender Biases and Perceptions of Self-Defense Claims in Intimate Partner Homicide. Journal of Family Violence. 29(5). 495–506. 20 indexed citations
10.
Dickson, Megan F., Nesa E. Wasarhaley, & J. Matthew Webster. (2013). A Comparison of First-Time and Repeat Rural DUI Offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 52(6). 421–437. 19 indexed citations
11.
Lynch, Kellie R., et al.. (2013). Who Bought the Drinks? Juror Perceptions of Intoxication in a Rape Trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 28(16). 3205–3222. 45 indexed citations
12.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E. & Jonathan M. Golding. (2013). Perceptions of Institutional Elder Neglect in Civil Court. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 25(4). 305–322. 4 indexed citations
13.
Golding, Jonathan M., et al.. (2012). When a Son Steals Money From His Mother: Courtroom Perceptions of Elder Financial Exploitation. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 25(2). 126–148. 15 indexed citations
14.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., et al.. (2012). Mock Juror Perception of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Testimony. Violence and Victims. 27(4). 500–511. 11 indexed citations
15.
Golding, Jonathan M., et al.. (2012). The Use of Flashcards in an Introduction to Psychology Class. Teaching of Psychology. 39(3). 199–202. 28 indexed citations
16.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., Jonathan M. Golding, Kellie R. Lynch, & Peggy S. Keller. (2012). The impact of abuse allegations in perceiving parricide in the courtroom. Psychology Crime and Law. 19(9). 783–799. 10 indexed citations
17.
Golding, Jonathan M., et al.. (2011). Mock Jurors’ Perception of Stalking: The Impact of Gender and Expressed Fear. Sex Roles. 66(5-6). 405–417. 26 indexed citations
18.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., et al.. (2011). The effect of SANE testimony on juror perceptions during a child sexual assault trial. 1 indexed citations
19.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E., et al.. (2011). Factors impacting juror perceptions of battered women who kill their abusers: Delay and sleeping status.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 18(2). 338–359. 6 indexed citations
20.
Wasarhaley, Nesa E.. (2010). INSTITUTIONAL ELDER NEGLECT IN CIVIL COURT: PERCEPTIONS OF VIDEO RECORDED VICTIM TESTIMONY. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026