Dawn Moore
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Criminal Justice and Penology
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Papers in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 5
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 3
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 1
- Law 3
- Criminal Justice and Penology 3
- Co-authors
- Mariana Valverde (3 shared papers)Kelly Hannah‐Moffat (1 shared paper)Kevin D. Haggerty (2 shared papers)Aaron Doyle (1 shared paper)Marian Krawczyk (1 shared paper)Tara Lyons (1 shared paper)Sarah Turnbull (2 shared papers)Christiane Wilke (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Theoretical Criminology (4 papers)Social & Legal Studies (2 papers)Punishment & Society (2 papers)Critical Criminology (1 paper)Economy and Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dawn Moore
28 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Law 56
- Sociology and Political Science 99
- Gender Studies 19
- Health 12
- Urban Studies 4
Countries citing papers authored by Dawn Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Dawn Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dawn Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dawn Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dawn Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dawn Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dawn Moore. The network helps show where Dawn Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dawn Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 3 | Criminal Artefacts: Governing Drugs and Users | 2007 | 33 |
| 4 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 15 | Critical criminology in Canada : new voices, new directions | 2011 | 8 |
| 16 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 17 | Policing Carceral Boundaries: Access to Information and Research with Prisoners | 2016 | 6 |
| 18 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 4 |
About Dawn Moore
Dawn Moore is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law, Gender Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (3 papers), Gender and Feminist Studies (1 paper), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (1 paper) and Sound Studies and Aurality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (56 citations), Sociology and Political Science (99 citations), Gender Studies (19 citations), Health (12 citations) and Urban Studies (4 citations). Dawn Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mariana Valverde, Kelly Hannah‐Moffat, Kevin D. Haggerty, Aaron Doyle, Marian Krawczyk, Tara Lyons, Sarah Turnbull and Christiane Wilke. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Criminology, Social & Legal Studies, Punishment & Society, Critical Criminology and Economy and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.