Neil Tennant

2.5k citations
113 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 16

Neil Tennant

100 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers

Neil Tennant
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • History and Philosophy of Science 239
  • Theoretical Computer Science 46
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 521
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 420
  • Philosophy 277
Replace Greg Restall with:
Greg Restall Australia
Gila Sher United States
Jc Beall United States
Vann McGee United States
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
Stephen Read United Kingdom
Charles Parsons United States
Timothy Smiley United Kingdom
Otávio Bueno United States
Bob Hale United Kingdom
Neil Tennant relative to Greg Restall Australia Greg Restall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Greg Restall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Tennant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Tennant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Tennant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Tennant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Tennant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Tennant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Tennant. The network helps show where Neil Tennant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Neil Tennant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Tennant Line = papers co-authored together Neil Tennant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20195
3 201721
4 201510
5 200310
6 20026
7 20028
8 20012
9 200015
10 20007
11
Priest, G.-Beyond the Limits of Thought
19981
12 199615
13 1995125
14 19892
15 19882
16 19855
17 19833
18 19771
19 19772
20 19770

About Neil Tennant

Neil Tennant is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 113 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (44 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (36 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (19 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (16 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (16 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (12 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (239 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (521 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (420 citations) and Philosophy (277 citations). Neil Tennant has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Smiley, D. J. Shoesmith, Michael Luntley, Florian von Schilcher, Fred Gifford, Kit Fine, Asa Kasher, Charles McCarty and Flint Schier. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophia Mathematica, The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind and Journal of Philosophical Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026