Citations per year, relative to Neil Richards Neil Richards (= 1×)
peers
Alessandro Mantelero
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Richards
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Richards more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Richards. The network helps show where Neil Richards may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Richards
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Richards.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Richards based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Richards. Neil Richards is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hartzog, Woodrow & Neil Richards. (2021). The Surprising Virtues of Data Loyalty. eYLS (Yale Law School).4 indexed citations
3.
Richards, Neil. (2021). Why Privacy Matters. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis).
4.
Hartzog, Woodrow & Neil Richards. (2020). Privacy's Constitutional Moment and the Limits of Data Protection. eYLS (Yale Law School). 61(5). 1687.19 indexed citations
5.
Richards, Neil & Woodrow Hartzog. (2019). The Pathologies of Digital Consent. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 96(6). 1461–1503.18 indexed citations
6.
Citron, Danielle Keats & Neil Richards. (2018). Four Principles for Digital Expression (You Won't Believe #3!). Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 95(6). 1353–1387.3 indexed citations
7.
Richards, Neil & Woodrow Hartzog. (2017). Privacy's Trust Gap: A Review. The Yale Law Journal. 126(4). 5.8 indexed citations
8.
Richards, Neil & Woodrow Hartzog. (2016). TAKING TRUST SERIOUSLY IN PRIVACY LAW. 19(3). 431.8 indexed citations
9.
Richards, Neil & Woodrow Hartzog. (2016). Trusting Big Data Research. The De Paul law review. 66(2). 10.2 indexed citations
Richards, Neil. (2013). The Dangers of Surveillance. Harvard Law Review. 126(7). 1934–1965.4 indexed citations
13.
Richards, Neil, et al.. (2013). Three Paradoxes of Big Data. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis).85 indexed citations
14.
Richards, Neil. (2010). The Puzzle of Brandeis, Privacy, and Speech. Vanderbilt law review. 63(5). 1293.2 indexed citations
15.
Solove, Daniel J. & Neil Richards. (2009). Rethinking Free Speech and Civil Liability. Columbia Law Review. 109.3 indexed citations
16.
Solove, Daniel J. & Neil Richards. (2007). Privacy's Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality. The Georgetown law journal. 96.13 indexed citations
17.
Richards, Neil & Daniel J. Solove. (2007). Privacy's Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality. SSRN Electronic Journal.21 indexed citations
18.
Richards, Neil. (2006). The Information Privacy Law Project. The Georgetown law journal. 94.3 indexed citations
19.
Richards, Neil. (2004). Reconciling Data Privacy and the First Amendment. UCLA law review. 52.3 indexed citations
20.
Layzell, Paul, et al.. (1994). Software assistance for business re-engineering.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.