Meg Leta Jones

555 total citations
32 papers, 229 citations indexed

About

Meg Leta Jones is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Meg Leta Jones has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 229 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Safety Research and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Meg Leta Jones's work include Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (12 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (10 papers) and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (3 papers). Meg Leta Jones is often cited by papers focused on Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (12 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (10 papers) and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (3 papers). Meg Leta Jones collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Meg Leta Jones's co-authors include Leticia Bode, Jef Ausloos, Diana Bowman, Giovanni Sartor, Katina Michael, Ronald Leenes, Karen Levy, Margot E. Kaminski, Jens‐Erik Mai and Neil Richards and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Communications of the ACM and Cortex.

In The Last Decade

Meg Leta Jones

30 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Meg Leta Jones
Gordon Hull United States
Marijn Sax Netherlands
Esther Keymolen Netherlands
Elettra Bietti United States
L. van der Velden Netherlands
Iason Gabriel United Kingdom
Rita İsmailova Kyrgyzstan
Mark Burdon Australia
Meg Leta Jones
Citations per year, relative to Meg Leta Jones Meg Leta Jones (= 1×) peers Tobias Matzner

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Leta Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Leta Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Leta Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Leta Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Leta Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Leta Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Leta Jones. The network helps show where Meg Leta Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meg Leta Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meg Leta Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meg Leta Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meg Leta Jones. Meg Leta Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2020). Ctrl + Z. New York University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jones, Meg Leta & Margot E. Kaminski. (2020). An American's Guide to the GDPR. Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver). 1 indexed citations
3.
Jones, Meg Leta, et al.. (2019). Analyzing the legal roots and moral core of digital consent. New Media & Society. 21(8). 1804–1823. 6 indexed citations
4.
Michael, Katina, et al.. (2018). Robots and Socio-Ethical Implications [Guest Editorial]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 37(1). 19–21. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Meg Leta, et al.. (2018). AI and the Ethics of Automating Consent. IEEE Security & Privacy. 16(3). 64–72. 23 indexed citations
6.
Bode, Leticia & Meg Leta Jones. (2018). Do Americans Want a Right to be Forgotten? Estimating Public Support for Digital Erasure Legislation. Policy & Internet. 10(3). 244–263. 3 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2017). The right to a human in the loop: Political constructions of computer automation and personhood. Social Studies of Science. 47(2). 216–239. 38 indexed citations
8.
Bode, Leticia & Meg Leta Jones. (2017). Ready to forget: American attitudes toward the right to be forgotten. The Information Society. 33(2). 76–85. 12 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Meg Leta, et al.. (2016). Can (and should) Hello Barbie keep a secret?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1–6. 6 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2016). Ctrl + Z. New York University Press eBooks. 27 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2016). Ctrl + Z: The Right to Be Forgotten. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 28 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2015). Privacy Without Screens & the Internet of Other People’s Things. 51(3). 639–660. 5 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Meg Leta, et al.. (2015). Users or Students? Privacy in University MOOCS. Science and Engineering Ethics. 22(5). 1473–1496. 10 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2015). The Ironies of Automation Law: Tying Policy Knots with Fair Automation Practices Principles. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Meg Leta, et al.. (2014). When Robots Lie: A Comparison of Auto-Defamation Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Meg Leta. (2014). Beyond 2015: Tackling inequality to help lift more people out of poverty. 2014(3). 12–15. 1 indexed citations
17.
18.
Jones, Meg Leta, et al.. (2012). Seeking Digital Redemption: The Future of Forgiveness in the Internet Age. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
19.
Jones, Meg Leta & Jef Ausloos. (2012). The Right to Be Forgotten Across the Pond. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
20.
Belmore, Susan M., et al.. (1980). Stimulus Competition and Ear Differences in Memory for Sentences. Cortex. 16(3). 435–443. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026