Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Ohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Ohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Ohm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Ohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Ohm. The network helps show where Paul Ohm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Ohm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Ohm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Ohm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Ohm. Paul Ohm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lane, Julia, Katherine J. Strandburg, Solon Barocas, et al.. (2014). Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good. Cambridge University Press eBooks.80 indexed citations
Ohm, Paul. (2013). The Underwhelming Benefits of Big Data. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 161(1). 22.9 indexed citations
9.
Ohm, Paul. (2012). Electronic Surveillance Law and the Intra-Agency Separation of Powers. USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco). 47(2). 4.1 indexed citations
10.
Ohm, Paul. (2012). The Fourth Amendment in a World Without Privacy. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
11.
Ohm, Paul. (2010). The Argument against Technology-Neutral Surveillance Laws. Texas law review. 88(7). 1685.12 indexed citations
12.
Grimmelmann, James & Paul Ohm. (2010). Dr. Generative Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Iphone. Maryland law review. 69(4). 910.6 indexed citations
13.
Ohm, Paul & James Grimmelmann. (2010). Dr. Generative Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the iPhone. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
14.
Ohm, Paul. (2010). Probably Probable Cause: The Diminishing Importance of Justification Standards. Minnesota law review.3 indexed citations
Ohm, Paul. (2009). Computer Programming and the Law: A New Research Agenda. Villanova law review.3 indexed citations
17.
Ohm, Paul. (2008). The Rise and Fall of Invasive ISP Surveillance. SSRN Electronic Journal.18 indexed citations
18.
Sicker, Douglas, et al.. (2007). The Analog Hole and the Price Of Music: An Empirical Study.. eYLS (Yale Law School). 5. 573–588.2 indexed citations
19.
Ohm, Paul. (2007). The Myth of the Superuser: Fear, Risk, and Harm Online. SSRN Electronic Journal.23 indexed citations
20.
Ohm, Paul, Douglas Sicker, & Dirk Grunwald. (2007). Legal Issues Surrounding Monitoring During Network Research (Invited Paper).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.