James Grimmelmann

895 citations
66 papers · 296 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Grimmelmann

53 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

James Grimmelmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Safety Research 50
  • Communication 28
  • Computer Science Applications 21
  • Marketing 29
Replace Salomé Viljoen with:
Salomé Viljoen United States
Yves Poullet Belgium
Joshua Fairfield United States
Francesca Musiani France
Joris van Hoboken Netherlands
Zubin Jelveh United States
Stephen Cory Robinson Sweden
Lena Ulbricht Germany
Jef Ausloos Netherlands
Neil Richards United States
James Grimmelmann relative to Salomé Viljoen United States Salomé Viljoen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Salomé Viljoen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Grimmelmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Grimmelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Grimmelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Grimmelmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Grimmelmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Grimmelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Grimmelmann. The network helps show where James Grimmelmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Grimmelmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Grimmelmann Line = papers co-authored together James Grimmelmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200529
2 200724
3 201723
4
Some Skepticism About Search Neutrality
201022
5 202320
6 202020
7
The Google Dilemma
200815
8 201911
9
Virtual World Feudalism
20098
10 20208
11 20177
12
Dr. Generative Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Iphone
20106
13
How to Fix the Google Book Search Settlement
20096
14 20246
15 20136
16 20245
17 20245
18 20095
19 20175
20 20184

About James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Law and Marketing, having authored 66 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Copyright and Intellectual Property (11 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (11 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (9 papers), Digital Rights Management and Security (6 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (4 papers) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (9 citations), Safety Research (50 citations), Communication (28 citations), Computer Science Applications (21 citations) and Marketing (29 citations). James Grimmelmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. Feder Cooper, Donald Braman, Dan M. Kahan, Katherine Lee, Paul Ohm, Jack M. Balkin, Tal Zarsky, Ari Juels, Sarah E. Allen and Sarah Meiklejohn. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Iowa law review, Fordham law review, University of Illinois law review and Washington and Lee law review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact