Nazia Darvesh
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Andrea C. TriccoMarco GhassemiSharon E. StrausVera NincicChantelle C. LachanceJane Pearson SharpeAmruta RadhakrishnanTyler Vaivada
- Topics
- Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers)Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nazia Darvesh
13 papers receiving 318 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Sociology and Political Science 142
- Nutrition and Dietetics 98
- Education 80
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 52
- Clinical Psychology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Nazia Darvesh
This map shows the geographic impact of Nazia Darvesh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nazia Darvesh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nazia Darvesh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nazia Darvesh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nazia Darvesh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nazia Darvesh. The network helps show where Nazia Darvesh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nazia Darvesh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nazia Darvesh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nazia Darvesh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nazia Darvesh. Nazia Darvesh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | Exploring the prevalence of gaming disorder and Internet gaming disorder: a rapid scoping reviewbreakdown → | 152 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 105 |
About Nazia Darvesh
Nazia Darvesh is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Information Systems and Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (98 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations) and Safety Research (29 citations). Nazia Darvesh has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrea C. Tricco, Marco Ghassemi, Sharon E. Straus, Vera Nincic, Chantelle C. Lachance, Jane Pearson Sharpe, Amruta Radhakrishnan, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta and Michelle F Gaffey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of General Internal Medicine and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.