Countries citing papers authored by Francesca Brundisini
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca Brundisini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca Brundisini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca Brundisini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca Brundisini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca Brundisini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca Brundisini. The network helps show where Francesca Brundisini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesca Brundisini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesca Brundisini.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesca Brundisini based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Francesca Brundisini. Francesca Brundisini is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brundisini, Francesca, et al.. (2023). Telephone Triage Services in Canada. Canadian Journal of Health Technologies. 3(9).1 indexed citations
5.
Hill, Shannon E., Michelle Gates, Francesca Brundisini, et al.. (2022). Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health. Canadian Journal of Health Technologies. 2(11).3 indexed citations
Brundisini, Francesca, et al.. (2019). Rural Breast Cancer Surgery Programs: A Rapid Qualitative Review [Internet].1 indexed citations
11.
Brundisini, Francesca, et al.. (2019). Rural Breast Cancer Surgery Programs: A Rapid Qualitative Review. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).2 indexed citations
12.
Hatchette, Todd F., Hyosung Jung, Cody Black, et al.. (2018). Screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis and Neisseria Gonorrhoeae During Pregnancy: A Health Technology Assessment.5 indexed citations
Vanstone, Meredith, et al.. (2015). Patient Perspectives on Quality of Life With Uncontrolled Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.. PubMed. 15(17). 1–29.52 indexed citations
16.
Brundisini, Francesca, Mita Giacomini, Deirdre DeJean, et al.. (2013). Chronic disease patients' experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.. PubMed. 13(15). 1–33.196 indexed citations
17.
Vanstone, Meredith, Mita Giacomini, Andrea L. Smith, et al.. (2013). How diet modification challenges are magnified in vulnerable or marginalized people with diabetes and heart disease: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.. PubMed. 13(14). 1–40.74 indexed citations
18.
Winsor, Shawn, Andrew Smith, Meredith Vanstone, et al.. (2013). Experiences of patient-centredness with specialized community-based care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.. PubMed. 13(17). 1–33.36 indexed citations
19.
DeJean, Deirdre, Mita Giacomini, Meredith Vanstone, & Francesca Brundisini. (2013). Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.. PubMed. 13(16). 1–33.224 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.