Reid Robson

4.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
20 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Reid Robson is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Reid Robson has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Reid Robson's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). Reid Robson is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). Reid Robson collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and China. Reid Robson's co-authors include Lehana Thabane, Afisi Ismaila, Jinhui Ma, Rong Chu, Marroon Thabane, Charles H. Goldsmith, Ji Cheng, Lora Giangregorio, Lorena P Rios and Andrea C. Tricco and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, PLoS ONE and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

In The Last Decade

Reid Robson

20 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 2017 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers

Reid Robson
Jinhui Ma Canada
Linda Kasten United States
Rong Chu Canada
Ji Cheng China
Elise Cogo Canada
Jinhui Ma Canada
Reid Robson
Citations per year, relative to Reid Robson Reid Robson (= 1×) peers Jinhui Ma

Countries citing papers authored by Reid Robson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reid Robson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reid Robson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reid Robson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reid Robson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reid Robson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reid Robson. The network helps show where Reid Robson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reid Robson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reid Robson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reid Robson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Reid Robson. Reid Robson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Robson, Reid, Sonia M. Thomas, Étienne V Langlois, et al.. (2023). Embedding rapid reviews in health policy and systems decision-making: Impacts and lessons learned from four low- and middle-income countries. Health Research Policy and Systems. 21(1). 45–45. 5 indexed citations
2.
Pham, Ba’, Patricia Rios, Amruta Radhakrishnan, et al.. (2022). Comparative-effectiveness research of COVID-19 treatment: a rapid scoping review. BMJ Open. 12(6). e045115–e045115. 8 indexed citations
3.
Pham, Ba’, Jelena Jovanović, Ebrahim Bagheri, et al.. (2021). Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow. Systematic Reviews. 10(1). 156–156. 35 indexed citations
4.
Jeyaraman, Maya M., Reid Robson, Leslie Copstein, et al.. (2021). Customized guidance/training improved the psychometric properties of methodologically rigorous risk of bias instruments for non-randomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 136. 157–167. 5 indexed citations
5.
Jeyaraman, Maya M., Nameer Al‐Yousif, Reid Robson, et al.. (2020). Inter-rater reliability and validity of risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: a study protocol. Systematic Reviews. 9(1). 32–32. 19 indexed citations
6.
Jeyaraman, Maya M., Rasheda Rabbani, Nameer Al‐Yousif, et al.. (2020). Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of ROBINS-I: protocol for a cross-sectional study. Systematic Reviews. 9(1). 12–12. 15 indexed citations
7.
Jeyaraman, Maya M., Rasheda Rabbani, Leslie Copstein, et al.. (2020). Methodologically rigorous risk of bias tools for nonrandomized studies had low reliability and high evaluator burden. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 128. 140–147. 14 indexed citations
8.
Tricco, Andrea C., Wasifa Zarin, Erin Lillie, et al.. (2018). Utility of social media and crowd-intelligence data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 18(1). 38–38. 50 indexed citations
9.
Pham, Ba’, Ebrahim Bagheri, Patricia Rios, et al.. (2018). Improving the conduct of systematic reviews: a process mining perspective. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 103. 101–111. 22 indexed citations
10.
Robson, Reid, Ba’ Pham, Jeremiah Hwee, et al.. (2018). Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 106. 121–135. 40 indexed citations
11.
Tricco, Andrea C., Sonia M. Thomas, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, et al.. (2018). Quality improvement strategies to prevent falls in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Age and Ageing. 48(3). 337–346. 23 indexed citations
12.
Reynen, Emily, Reid Robson, John D. Ivory, et al.. (2017). A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 96. 23–34. 39 indexed citations
13.
Tricco, Andrea C., Sonia M. Thomas, Jesmin Antony, et al.. (2017). Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review. PLoS ONE. 12(1). e0169718–e0169718. 39 indexed citations
14.
Tricco, Andrea C., Sonia M. Thomas, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, et al.. (2017). Comparisons of Interventions for Preventing Falls in Older Adults. JAMA. 318(17). 1687–1687. 395 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Pham, Ba’, et al.. (2017). Improving quality and efficiency in selecting, abstracting and appraising studies for rapid reviews. Monash University Research Portal (Monash University). 39–53. 1 indexed citations
16.
Tricco, Andrea C., Charlene Soobiah, Erik Blondal, et al.. (2015). Comparative efficacy of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 13(1). 136–136. 116 indexed citations
17.
Tricco, Andrea C., Charlene Soobiah, Erik Blondal, et al.. (2015). Comparative safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 13(1). 142–142. 48 indexed citations
18.
Thabane, Lehana, Jinhui Ma, Rong Chu, et al.. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 10(1). 1–1. 2087 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Katz, Yitzhak, et al.. (1998). Fluticasone propionate 50 μg BID versus 100 μg BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. Clinical Therapeutics. 20(3). 424–437. 33 indexed citations
20.
Dolovich, Jerry, Maureen P. Briscoe, James Day, et al.. (1996). Intranasal fluticasone propionate versus loratadine in the treatment of adolescent patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 97(2). 588–595. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026