Nathaniel Lasry

1.1k total citations
35 papers, 703 citations indexed

About

Nathaniel Lasry is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Media Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathaniel Lasry has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 703 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Education, 12 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 8 papers in Media Technology. Recurrent topics in Nathaniel Lasry's work include Innovative Teaching Methods (19 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (8 papers). Nathaniel Lasry is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching Methods (19 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (8 papers). Nathaniel Lasry collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Brazil. Nathaniel Lasry's co-authors include Eric Mazur, Jessica Watkins, Elizabeth S. Charles, Kelly Miller, Kelvin Chu, Helena Dedic, Steven Rosenfield, Orad Reshef, Noah D. Finkelstein and Jonathan Guillemette and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Physics, American Journal of Physics and IEEE Sensors Journal.

In The Last Decade

Nathaniel Lasry

34 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathaniel Lasry Canada 12 595 209 169 54 46 35 703
Valerie K. Otero United States 16 834 1.4× 173 0.8× 290 1.7× 41 0.8× 47 1.0× 44 981
Jessica Watkins United States 15 807 1.4× 211 1.0× 369 2.2× 94 1.7× 34 0.7× 31 1.0k
Marina Milner‐Bolotin Canada 15 424 0.7× 104 0.5× 150 0.9× 52 1.0× 59 1.3× 60 578
Paula V. Engelhardt United States 15 573 1.0× 157 0.8× 235 1.4× 63 1.2× 28 0.6× 89 723
Scott Bonham United States 7 466 0.8× 180 0.9× 175 1.0× 65 1.2× 48 1.0× 14 587
Jennifer L. Docktor United States 9 865 1.5× 88 0.4× 262 1.6× 63 1.2× 69 1.5× 12 1.0k
Jeffery M. Saul United States 6 706 1.2× 235 1.1× 348 2.1× 49 0.9× 33 0.7× 7 828
Scott Anderson United States 5 435 0.7× 112 0.5× 222 1.3× 32 0.6× 19 0.4× 11 584
Duane Deardorff United States 6 461 0.8× 183 0.9× 167 1.0× 57 1.1× 24 0.5× 10 566
Miky Ronen Israel 11 346 0.6× 89 0.4× 234 1.4× 83 1.5× 87 1.9× 43 530

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Lasry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Lasry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Lasry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Lasry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Lasry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Lasry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Lasry. The network helps show where Nathaniel Lasry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel Lasry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel Lasry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel Lasry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel Lasry. Nathaniel Lasry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gurve, Dharmendra, et al.. (2024). A Vital-Signs Monitoring Wristband With Real-Time In-Sensor Data Analysis Using Very Low-Hardware Resources. IEEE Sensors Journal. 24(11). 18392–18404. 2 indexed citations
2.
Charles, Elizabeth S., et al.. (2023). Role of Epistemic Artifacts for Engaging in Collaborative Learning. Computer-supported collaborative learning/˜The œComputer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference. 293–296. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rouette, Julie, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of the quality of mammographic breast positioning: a quality improvement study. CMAJ Open. 9(2). E607–E612. 5 indexed citations
4.
Charles, Elizabeth S., et al.. (2020). DESIGNING ERROR DETECTION PROMPTS AND PEER FEEDBACK FOR PHYSICS CLASSROOMS. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). 1 indexed citations
5.
Lasry, Nathaniel, et al.. (2019). Error detection tasks and peer feedback for engaging physics students. 3 indexed citations
6.
Charles, Elizabeth S., et al.. (2019). Harnessing peer instruction in and out of class with myDALITE. 42. 89–89. 5 indexed citations
7.
Desmarais, Michel C., et al.. (2016). Text Classification of Student Self-Explanations in College Physics Questions.. PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal). 571–572. 1 indexed citations
8.
Lasry, Nathaniel, et al.. (2016). The Adoption of Socio-Technological Environments to Drive Classroom Change. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 1 indexed citations
9.
Lasry, Nathaniel, et al.. (2016). Effective variations of peer instruction: The effects of peer discussions, committing to an answer, and reaching a consensus. American Journal of Physics. 84(8). 639–645. 15 indexed citations
10.
Desmarais, Michel C., et al.. (2015). An Analysis of Peer-submitted and Peer-reviewed Answer Rationales in a Web-based Peer Instruction Based Learning Environment.. Educational Data Mining. 456–459. 1 indexed citations
11.
Charles, Elizabeth S., et al.. (2015). Beyond and Within Classroom Walls: Designing Principled Pedagogical Tools for Student and Faculty Uptake.. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. 2 indexed citations
12.
Lasry, Nathaniel, et al.. (2015). An Analysis of Peer-Submitted and Peer-Reviewed Answer Rationales, in an Asynchronous Peer Instruction Based Learning Environment.. Educational Data Mining. 5 indexed citations
13.
Miller, Kelly, et al.. (2014). Conceptual question response times in Peer Instruction classrooms. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 10(2). 33 indexed citations
14.
Lasry, Nathaniel, et al.. (2013). Response times to conceptual questions. American Journal of Physics. 81(9). 703–706. 25 indexed citations
15.
Lasry, Nathaniel, et al.. (2011). Engineering magical learning environments. International journal of engineering education. 27(3). 580–584. 1 indexed citations
16.
Miller, Kelly, Nathaniel Lasry, Orad Reshef, et al.. (2010). Losing it: The Influence of Losses on Individuals’ Normalized Gains. AIP conference proceedings. 229–232. 5 indexed citations
17.
Charles, Elizabeth S., et al.. (2010). Does scale matter: using different lenses to understand collaborative knowledge building. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 120–121. 1 indexed citations
18.
Price, Edward, et al.. (2010). Comparing Educational Tools Using Activity Theory: Clickers and Flashcards. AIP conference proceedings. 265–268.
19.
Lasry, Nathaniel, Noah D. Finkelstein, & Eric Mazur. (2009). Are Most People Too Dumb for Physics?. The Physics Teacher. 47(7). 418–422. 13 indexed citations
20.
Lasry, Nathaniel. (2008). Clickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference?. The Physics Teacher. 46(4). 242–244. 100 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026