Nathaniel L. Gage is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics and Education.
According to data from OpenAlex, Nathaniel L. Gage has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 11.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science, 1 paper in Language and Linguistics and 1 paper in Education. Recurrent topics in Nathaniel L. Gage's work include Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (1 paper) and Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper). Nathaniel L. Gage is often cited by papers focused on Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (1 paper) and Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper). Nathaniel L. Gage collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nathaniel L. Gage's co-authors include Donald T. Campbell, Julian C. Stanley, Robert F. McNergney, David C. Berliner and Gerhard Bach and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Researcher, The Journal of Experimental Education and Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel L. Gage
5 papers
receiving
9.0k citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research
196310.8k citationsDonald T. Campbell, Julian C. Stanley et al.Medical Entomology and Zoologyprofile →
Citations per field, relative to Nathaniel L. Gage
Nathaniel L. Gage · 1×
×0.92.3kEDUCA
×1.32.5kSPS
×0.91.6kDEP
×2.13.0kSP
×1.62.2kCP
Citations per year, relative to Nathaniel L. Gage
Nathaniel L. Gage · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel L. Gage
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel L. Gage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel L. Gage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel L. Gage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel L. Gage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel L. Gage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel L. Gage. The network helps show where Nathaniel L. Gage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel L. Gage
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel L. Gage.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel L. Gage based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel L. Gage. Nathaniel L. Gage is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
2009·Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))·Nathaniel L. Gage
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.