Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Role of Schooling in Perpetuating Educational Inequality
2015173 citationsWilliam H. Schmidt, Nathan Burroughs et al.Educational Researcherprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Burroughs
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Burroughs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Burroughs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Burroughs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Burroughs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Burroughs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Burroughs. The network helps show where Nathan Burroughs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Burroughs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Burroughs.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Burroughs based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Burroughs. Nathan Burroughs is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Burroughs, Nathan, et al.. (2019). Teaching for Excellence and Equity: Analyzing Teacher Characteristics, Behaviors and Student Outcomes with TIMSS. IEA Research for Education. Volume 6..1 indexed citations
Burroughs, Nathan. (2017). Republicanism and Stability.
8.
Burroughs, Nathan & Amita Chudgar. (2017). The Role of Teacher Quality in Fourth-Grade Mathematics Instruction: Evidence from TIMSS 2015. Policy Brief No. 16..2 indexed citations
Schmidt, William H. & Nathan Burroughs. (2015). Puzzling out PISA: What Can International Comparisons Tell Us about American Education?.. The American Educator. 39(1). 24–31.4 indexed citations
12.
Cogan, Leland S., Nathan Burroughs, & William H. Schmidt. (2015). Supporting classroom instruction. Phi Delta Kappan. 97(1). 29–33.2 indexed citations
13.
Schmidt, William H., Nathan Burroughs, Pablo Zoido, & Richard T. Houang. (2015). The Role of Schooling in Perpetuating Educational Inequality. Educational Researcher. 44(7). 371–386.173 indexed citations breakdown →
Schmidt, William H. & Nathan Burroughs. (2013). Springing to Life: How Greater Educational Equality Could Grow from the Common Core Mathematics Standards.. The American Educator. 37(1). 2–9.4 indexed citations
17.
Schmidt, William H. & Nathan Burroughs. (2013). How the Common Core Boosts Quality and Equality.. Educational leadership. 70(4). 54–58.9 indexed citations
18.
Schmidt, William H., et al.. (2011). Are College Rankings an Indicator of Quality Education. Forum on public policy. 2011(3).2 indexed citations
19.
Plucker, Jonathan A., et al.. (2008). 2008 Public Opinion Survey on K-12 Education in Indiana..1 indexed citations
20.
Burroughs, Nathan. (2008). Arguments and Evidence: The Debate over Collective Bargaining's Role in Public Education.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.