Natasha Matthews

54 total papers · 870 total citations
33 papers, 607 citations indexed

About

Natasha Matthews is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Matthews has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 607 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natasha Matthews's work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (9 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Natasha Matthews is often cited by papers focused on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (9 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Natasha Matthews collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Natasha Matthews's co-authors include Sohee Park, Crystal Gibson, Mark A. Bellgrove, Robert Sekuler, Patricia T. Michie, Alasdair Vance, Paul E. Dux, Jason B. Mattingley, Ziarih Hawi and Michael Gill and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Matthews

32 papers receiving 591 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Natasha Matthews	327	244	113	91	54	33	607
Yuliya Zaytseva	382 1.2×	169 0.7×	94 0.8×	136 1.5×	41 0.8×	48	594
Zoë Thayer	270 0.8×	431 1.8×	57 0.5×	103 1.1×	25 0.5×	27	668
Sanne Brederoo	260 0.8×	162 0.7×	88 0.8×	150 1.6×	17 0.3×	32	541
Michele Ribolsi	346 1.1×	183 0.8×	65 0.6×	44 0.5×	32 0.6×	45	674
Mauro F. Larra	269 0.8×	110 0.5×	116 1.0×	96 1.1×	18 0.3×	34	657
Tal Shany‐Ur	452 1.4×	339 1.4×	109 1.0×	74 0.8×	24 0.4×	19	658
Rohani Omar	395 1.2×	140 0.6×	174 1.5×	128 1.4×	65 1.2×	17	623
Joseph Wortis	158 0.5×	98 0.4×	57 0.5×	80 0.9×	22 0.4×	48	579
Michael‐Paul Schallmo	469 1.4×	106 0.4×	44 0.4×	95 1.0×	18 0.3×	36	629
Iwona Szatkowska	373 1.1×	84 0.3×	151 1.3×	138 1.5×	59 1.1×	40	697

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Matthews

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Matthews

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Matthews. The network helps show where Natasha Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Matthews

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Matthews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Matthews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Matthews. Natasha Matthews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact