Natasha Matthews

878 total citations
33 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

Natasha Matthews is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Matthews has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natasha Matthews's work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). Natasha Matthews is often cited by papers focused on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). Natasha Matthews collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Natasha Matthews's co-authors include Sohee Park, Crystal Gibson, Mark A. Bellgrove, Robert Sekuler, Patricia T. Michie, Alasdair Vance, Jason B. Mattingley, Paul E. Dux, Ziarih Hawi and Katharine N. Thakkar and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Matthews

32 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Natasha Matthews
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 329
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 244
  • Social Psychology 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Sensory Systems 54
Replace Yuliya Zaytseva with:
Yuliya Zaytseva Czechia
S. Krljes United Kingdom
Zoë Thayer Australia
Alea Khan United States
Sanne Brederoo Netherlands
Marije van Beilen Netherlands
Christine A. Carroll United States
Rohani Omar United Kingdom
Frédéric Peters Belgium
Elias Mouchlianitis United Kingdom
Yuliya Zaytseva Czechia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natasha Matthews
Natasha Matthews · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Natasha Matthews
Natasha Matthews · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Matthews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Matthews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Matthews. The network helps show where Natasha Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Matthews

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Matthews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Matthews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Matthews. Natasha Matthews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 6
3 15
4 5
5 6
6 21
7 13
8 33
9 31
10 3
11 21
12 8
13 11
14 41
15 54
16 26
17 62
18 54
19 79
20 29

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026