John W. Burns
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Stephen BruehlPhillip J. QuartanaBeverly E. ThornMelissa A. DayBeth A. GlennFrancis J. KeefeJames GerhartKenneth R. Lofland
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (66 papers)Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (31 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (27 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyPain
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
John W. Burns
110 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Pharmacology 1.5k
- Clinical Psychology 809
- Cognitive Neuroscience 789
- Psychiatry and Mental health 688
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 582
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Burns
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Burns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Burns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Burns. The network helps show where John W. Burns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Burns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Burns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Burns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Burns. John W. Burns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 85 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | John Burns : the rise and progress of a right honourable | 1 |
About John W. Burns
John W. Burns is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (66 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (31 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.5k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (688 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (582 citations). John W. Burns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Bruehl, Phillip J. Quartana, Beverly E. Thorn, Melissa A. Day, Beth A. Glenn, Francis J. Keefe, James Gerhart, Kenneth R. Lofland, Mark P. Jensen and Laura S. Porter. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.