Alasdair Vance
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Timothy J. SilkPaul MaruffJohn L. BradshawRoss CunningtonMark A. BellgroveRapson GomezErnest LukNicole Rinehart
- Topics
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (79 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (53 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alasdair Vance
133 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
- Clinical Psychology 854
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 476
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 413
Countries citing papers authored by Alasdair Vance
This map shows the geographic impact of Alasdair Vance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alasdair Vance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alasdair Vance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alasdair Vance
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alasdair Vance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alasdair Vance. The network helps show where Alasdair Vance may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alasdair Vance
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alasdair Vance. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alasdair Vance based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alasdair Vance. Alasdair Vance is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 97 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 280 |
About Alasdair Vance
Alasdair Vance is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 137 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (79 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (53 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations) and Clinical Psychology (854 citations). Alasdair Vance has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Silk, Paul Maruff, John L. Bradshaw, Ross Cunnington, Mark A. Bellgrove, Rapson Gomez, Ernest Luk, Nicole Rinehart, Yasong Du and Wenqing Jiang. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PEDIATRICS and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.