Natasha Cortis
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Abigail PowellGabrielle MeagherIlan KatzLyn CraigRoger PatulnyCiara SmythPatricia Cullenkylie valentine
- Topics
- Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (13 papers)Community Development and Social Impact (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natasha Cortis
57 papers receiving 624 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Sociology and Political Science 297
- General Health Professions 263
- Education 137
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Gender Studies 107
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Cortis
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Cortis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Cortis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Cortis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Cortis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Cortis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Cortis. The network helps show where Natasha Cortis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Cortis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Cortis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Cortis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Cortis. Natasha Cortis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | Women, Work and Welfare in the Activation State: an Agenda for Australian Research | 7 |
| 19 | Welfare to work and vulnerable parents and young people in Australia - lessons from international experience | 1 |
| 20 | Research Collaboration in the Child Welfare Field: Ingredients for Success | 1 |
About Natasha Cortis
Natasha Cortis is a scholar working on Public Administration, Finance and General Health Professions, having authored 63 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (13 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (97 citations), Health (97 citations) and Gender Studies (107 citations). Natasha Cortis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Abigail Powell, Gabrielle Meagher, Ilan Katz, Lyn Craig, Roger Patulny, Ciara Smyth, Patricia Cullen, kylie valentine, Jan Breckenridge and Meraiah Foley. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Violence Against Women and Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.