Debra King

972 total citations
34 papers, 659 citations indexed

About

Debra King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra King has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 659 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Debra King's work include Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). Debra King is often cited by papers focused on Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). Debra King collaborates with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Germany. Debra King's co-authors include Helena Flam, Linda Isherwood, Mary A. Luszcz, Wei Zhang, A Howe, Colin MacDougall, Jennene Greenhill, Yvonne Wells, Julie Ellis and Erica Bell and has published in prestigious journals such as Sociology, Ageing and Society and The British Journal of Social Work.

In The Last Decade

Debra King

32 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Debra King Australia	14	310	255	92	91	90	34	659
Ellen K. Scott United States	15	433 1.4×	360 1.4×	116 1.3×	101 1.1×	68 0.8×	31	814
Kristin Natalier Australia	14	396 1.3×	163 0.6×	52 0.6×	89 1.0×	132 1.5×	69	673
Megan Reid United States	12	256 0.8×	133 0.5×	123 1.3×	48 0.5×	57 0.6×	26	468
Linda Waimarie Nīkora New Zealand	14	280 0.9×	320 1.3×	148 1.6×	119 1.3×	45 0.5×	76	782
Kirstine Hansen United Kingdom	15	291 0.9×	163 0.6×	120 1.3×	64 0.7×	63 0.7×	34	700
Jennifer Reid Keene United States	15	443 1.4×	146 0.6×	143 1.6×	112 1.2×	164 1.8×	33	729
Tracy X. Karner United States	12	358 1.2×	247 1.0×	85 0.9×	47 0.5×	73 0.8×	23	635
William Paul Simmons United States	9	289 0.9×	188 0.7×	88 1.0×	26 0.3×	32 0.4×	23	602
Monica McDermott United States	12	729 2.4×	161 0.6×	90 1.0×	142 1.6×	44 0.5×	36	914
Paul Maxim Canada	14	549 1.8×	148 0.6×	81 0.9×	134 1.5×	54 0.6×	41	764

Countries citing papers authored by Debra King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra King. The network helps show where Debra King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra King. Debra King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Natalier, Kristin, et al.. (2020). Workplace Violence Against Domestic and Family Violence and Sexual Assault Workers: A Gendered, Settings-Based Approach. The British Journal of Social Work. 51(7). 2301–2320. 4 indexed citations

2.

Brown, Lynsey, Katy Osborne, Ruth Walker, et al.. (2017). The Benefits of a Life-first employment program for Indigenous Australian families: Implications for ‘Closing the Gap’. Journal of Social Inclusion. 8(1). 78–95. 2 indexed citations

3.

Brown, Lynsey, Katy Osborne, Ruth Walker, et al.. (2017). The Benefits of a Life-first employment program for Indigenous Australian families: Implications for ‘Closing the Gap’. Journal of Social Inclusion. 8(1). 78–78. 1 indexed citations

4.

Walker, Ruth, et al.. (2016). ‘They really get you motivated’: Experiences of a life-first employment programme from the perspective of long-term unemployed Australians. Journal of Social Policy. 45(3). 507–526. 8 indexed citations

5.

Isherwood, Linda, Mary A. Luszcz, & Debra King. (2015). Reciprocity in material and time support within parent–child relationships during late-life widowhood. Ageing and Society. 36(8). 1668–1689. 13 indexed citations

6.

Willis, Eileen, et al.. (2015). Women and Gynaecological Cancer: Gender and the Doctor–Patient Relationship. Topoi. 36(3). 509–519. 3 indexed citations

7.

King, Debra, Wei Zhang, & A Howe. (2013). Work Satisfaction and Intention to Leave Among Direct Care Workers in Community and Residential Aged Care in Australia. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 25(4). 301–319. 39 indexed citations

8.

King, Debra. (2013). The aged care workforce 2012: final report. 33 indexed citations

9.

Willis, Eileen, et al.. (2012). The treatment experiences of Australian women with gynaecological cancers and how they can be improved: a qualitative study. Reproductive Health Matters. 20(40). 38–48. 6 indexed citations

10.

Isherwood, Linda, Debra King, & Mary A. Luszcz. (2012). A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Engagement in Late-Life Widowhood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 74(3). 211–229. 36 indexed citations

11.

Willis, Eileen, et al.. (2011). Indigenous women’s expectations of clinical care during treatment for a gynaecological cancer: rural and remote differences in expectations. Australian Health Review. 35(1). 99–103. 15 indexed citations

12.

Willis, Eileen & Debra King. (2011). Independent regulatory agencies and Australia's health workforce crisis. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 31(1/2). 21–33. 2 indexed citations

13.

Hanna, E., Erica Bell, Debra King, & Rosalie Woodruff. (2011). Climate Change and Australian Agriculture: A Review of the Threats Facing Rural Communities and the Health Policy Landscape. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 23(2_suppl). 105S–118S. 21 indexed citations

14.

King, Debra, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of the Better Access Initiative Component C: Analysis of the Allied Mental Health Workforce Supply and Distribution. 2 indexed citations

15.

King, Debra, et al.. (2009). The Resilience and mental health and wellbeing of farm families experiencing climate variation in South Australia. 13 indexed citations

16.

King, Debra, et al.. (2008). Framing ideology in the niche media. Journal of sociology. 44(4). 355–371. 17 indexed citations

17.

King, Debra, Bill Martin, Judith Dwyer, et al.. (2008). Review of the Gynaecological Cancers Workforce, Report for Cancer Australia. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1–165. 1 indexed citations

18.

King, Debra & William Marty Martin. (2007). Guest Editor's Introduction: Australian research and thinking about paid care and its future. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 42(2). 131–134. 2 indexed citations

19.

Flam, Helena & Debra King. (2007). Emotions and Social Movements. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 154 indexed citations

20.

King, Debra. (2006). Activists and Emotional Reflexivity: Toward Touraine’s Subject as Social Movement. Sociology. 40(5). 873–891. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact