Craig Bourne

16 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Craig Bourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 104
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 200
  • Philosophy 158
  • General Psychology 3
  • General Decision Sciences 4
Replace Natalja Deng with:
Natalja Deng South Korea
Peter Forrest Australia
Jiri Benovsky Switzerland
Darren Bradley United States
Simon Prosser United Kingdom
Dan Marshall Hong Kong
Giuliano Torrengo Italy
L. Nathan Oaklander United States
Peter Forrest Australia
Thomas Hofweber United States
Craig Bourne relative to Natalja Deng South Korea Natalja Deng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Natalja Deng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Bourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Bourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Bourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Bourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Bourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Bourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Bourne. The network helps show where Craig Bourne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Craig Bourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig Bourne Line = papers co-authored together Craig Bourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2006142
2 200253
3 200617
4 200514
5 200410
6 200410
7 20197
8 20167
9 20184
10 20124
11 20043
12 20112
13 20172
14 20162
15
ZAMM and the Art of Philosophical Fiction
20141
16 20161
17
Presentism: Essential Readings
20101
18 20250
19
Philosophical Ridings: Motorcycles and the Meaning of Life
20070

About Craig Bourne

Craig Bourne is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Literature and Literary Theory and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (104 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (200 citations), Philosophy (158 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). Craig Bourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include John Bigelow, Simon Keller, Hilary Putnam, Thomas M. Crisp, William Lane Craig, Trenton Merricks, Rafaël De Clercq, Matthew Davidson, Dean W. Zimmerman and A. N. Prior. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Journal of Philosophy of Education, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, The British Journal of Aesthetics and Philosophical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact