Andrew J. Latham
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 16
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 9
- Categorization, perception, and language 5
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 15
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 5
- Free Will and Agency 5
- Philosophy top 2%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 8
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
- Co-authors
- Kristie MillerJames NortonLucy L. M. PatstonLynette J. TippettPreston GreeneAlex O. HolcombeChristian TarsneyJoseph Watts
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew J. Latham
52 papers receiving 505 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Decision Sciences 109
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 254
- Cognitive Neuroscience 210
- Philosophy 102
- History and Philosophy of Science 38
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Latham
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Latham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Latham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Latham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Latham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Latham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Latham. The network helps show where Andrew J. Latham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew J. Latham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 18 | The Validation of Consciousness Meters: The Idiosyncratic and Intransitive Sequence of Conscious Levels | 2017 | 2 |
| 19 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 18 |
About Andrew J. Latham
Andrew J. Latham is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 66 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (5 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (109 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (254 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (210 citations). Andrew J. Latham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristie Miller, James Norton, Lucy L. M. Patston, Lynette J. Tippett, Preston Greene, Alex O. Holcombe, Christian Tarsney, Joseph Watts, Quentin D. Atkinson and Somogy Varga. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.