Sam Coleman
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 17
- Philosophy 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 2
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Co-authors
- Torin Alter (3 shared papers)Robert J. Howell (1 shared paper)Barbara Gail Montero (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Erkenntnis (2 papers)Journal of Consciousness Studies (2 papers)dialectica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Sam Coleman
19 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- History and Philosophy of Science 56
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
- Philosophy 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 67
- Social Psychology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Sam Coleman
This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Coleman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Coleman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Coleman. The network helps show where Sam Coleman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Sam Coleman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 6 | Being realistic - why physicalism may entail panexperientialism | 2006 | 10 |
| 7 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 9 | Why the Ability Hypothesis is best forgotten | 2009 | 5 |
| 10 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | Neutral Monism: A Saner Solution to the Problem | 2017 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Sam Coleman
Sam Coleman is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (129 citations), Philosophy (100 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations) and Social Psychology (23 citations). Sam Coleman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Torin Alter, Robert J. Howell and Barbara Gail Montero. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Erkenntnis, Journal of Consciousness Studies and dialectica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.