Klaas Landsman

753 total citations
16 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Klaas Landsman is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Klaas Landsman has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Klaas Landsman's work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers). Klaas Landsman is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers). Klaas Landsman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United Kingdom. Klaas Landsman's co-authors include Terry Rudolph, Roger Colbeck, Matthew Leifer, Eric Cator, Ellen van Wolde, Valter Moretti and Natalja Deng and has published in prestigious journals such as General Relativity and Gravitation, Reviews in Mathematical Physics and Foundations of Physics.

In The Last Decade

Klaas Landsman

15 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Klaas Landsman

AMPO

AI

SNP

HPS

CN

Holger Lyre Germany

Robert C. Bishop United States

Alexei Grinbaum France

Arkady Plotnitsky United States

Peter Carruthers Italy

Geoffrey L. Price United States

Paul Bartha Canada

J. Acácio de Barros United States

Thomas Filk Germany

Holger Lyre Germany

Klaas Landsman

143 ×1.2

AMPO

46 ×0.8

AI

51 ×0.9

SNP

145 ×3.0

HPS

59 ×1.5

CN

Citations per year, relative to Klaas Landsman Klaas Landsman (= 1×) peers Holger Lyre

Countries citing papers authored by Klaas Landsman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaas Landsman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaas Landsman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaas Landsman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaas Landsman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaas Landsman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaas Landsman. The network helps show where Klaas Landsman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaas Landsman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaas Landsman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaas Landsman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klaas Landsman. Klaas Landsman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Landsman, Klaas. (2023). Typical = Random. Axioms. 12(8). 727–727. 1 indexed citations

2.

Landsman, Klaas. (2023). Reopening the Hole Argument. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 1(1). 4 indexed citations

3.

Landsman, Klaas. (2022). Bohmian Mechanics is Not Deterministic. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 4 indexed citations

4.

Landsman, Klaas. (2022). Penrose’s 1965 singularity theorem: from geodesic incompleteness to cosmic censorship. General Relativity and Gravitation. 54(10). 14 indexed citations

5.

Landsman, Klaas. (2021). Foundations of General Relativity: From Einstein to Black Holes. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 10 indexed citations

6.

Landsman, Klaas, et al.. (2020). Strict deformation quantization of the state space of Mk(ℂ) with applications to the Curie–Weiss model. Reviews in Mathematical Physics. 32(10). 2050031–2050031. 5 indexed citations

7.

Landsman, Klaas. (2018). Foundations of Quantum Theory: From Classical Concepts to Operator Algebras. PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh). 48 indexed citations

8.

Landsman, Klaas. (2017). Foundations of Quantum Theory. Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation). 62 indexed citations

9.

Landsman, Klaas, et al.. (2016). The Kadison–Singer conjecture. Lirias (KU Leuven). 17(1). 41–46. 1 indexed citations

10.

Landsman, Klaas, et al.. (2016). A bounded transform approach to self-adjoint operators: Functional calculus and affiliated von Neumann algebras. Annals of Functional Analysis. 7(3). 411–420. 3 indexed citations

11.

Landsman, Klaas. (2016). On the notion of free will in the Free Will Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 57. 98–103. 4 indexed citations

12.

Deng, Natalja & Klaas Landsman. (2016). Does physics make us free?. Metascience. 26(1). 127–130.

13.

Landsman, Klaas, et al.. (2016). The Challenge of Chance. Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation). 7 indexed citations

14.

Leifer, Matthew, Klaas Landsman, Roger Colbeck, & Terry Rudolph. (2014). Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology Theorems. arXiv (Cornell University). 29 indexed citations

15.

Cator, Eric & Klaas Landsman. (2014). Constraints on Determinism: Bell Versus Conway–Kochen. Foundations of Physics. 44(7). 781–791. 6 indexed citations

16.

Landsman, Klaas. (2007). I Am a Strange Loop. 112 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact