Natalie Gracia

499 total citations
9 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Natalie Gracia is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Gracia has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Natalie Gracia's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). Natalie Gracia is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). Natalie Gracia collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and France. Natalie Gracia's co-authors include Wendy Moyle, Sally Borbasi, Ursula Kellett, Alison Ballantyne, Marianne Wallis, Jenny Murfield, Lorraine Venturato, Raymond C. K. Chan, Jing Jin and Katrina Radford and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Neurology and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Gracia

9 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Gracia Australia 8 186 159 70 70 48 9 360
Kimberly S. Van Haitsma United States 6 211 1.1× 222 1.4× 60 0.9× 53 0.8× 54 1.1× 8 354
Sue Watts United Kingdom 10 192 1.0× 181 1.1× 75 1.1× 72 1.0× 24 0.5× 12 365
Phuong Leung United Kingdom 13 243 1.3× 363 2.3× 105 1.5× 75 1.1× 59 1.2× 28 565
Kévin Charras France 10 201 1.1× 221 1.4× 42 0.6× 41 0.6× 44 0.9× 32 455
Stéphanie Pin France 10 108 0.6× 108 0.7× 34 0.5× 39 0.6× 71 1.5× 22 289
Lisa Kirk Wiese United States 11 101 0.5× 125 0.8× 53 0.8× 39 0.6× 82 1.7× 44 318
Sofia Vikström Sweden 10 134 0.7× 163 1.0× 49 0.7× 44 0.6× 29 0.6× 27 359
Ana Diaz United Kingdom 8 281 1.5× 261 1.6× 40 0.6× 96 1.4× 60 1.3× 19 517
Ana Barbosa Portugal 13 244 1.3× 172 1.1× 55 0.8× 79 1.1× 14 0.3× 25 408
Rachael Litherland United Kingdom 10 180 1.0× 169 1.1× 60 0.9× 31 0.4× 81 1.7× 24 313

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Gracia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Gracia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Gracia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Gracia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Gracia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Gracia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Gracia. The network helps show where Natalie Gracia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Gracia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Gracia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Gracia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Gracia. Natalie Gracia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Leslie, Felicity, Natalie Gracia, Lauren Bartley, et al.. (2014). Heritability in frontotemporal dementia: more missing pieces?. Journal of Neurology. 261(11). 2170–2177. 23 indexed citations
2.
Shahid, Muhammad, et al.. (2014). Crowdsourcing based subjective quality assessment of adaptive video streaming. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 53–54. 11 indexed citations
3.
Moyle, Wendy, et al.. (2011). Assessing quality of life of older people with dementia in long‐term care: a comparison of two self‐report measures. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 21(11-12). 1632–1640. 24 indexed citations
4.
Moyle, Wendy, Ursula Kellett, Alison Ballantyne, & Natalie Gracia. (2011). Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 20(9-10). 1445–1453. 101 indexed citations
5.
Yang, Binrang, Raymond C. K. Chan, Natalie Gracia, et al.. (2011). Cool and hot executive functions in medication-naive attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children. Psychological Medicine. 41(12). 2593–2602. 39 indexed citations
6.
Moyle, Wendy, Charlotte Clarke, Natalie Gracia, et al.. (2010). Older people maintaining mental health well‐being through resilience: an appreciative inquiry study in four countries. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 2(2). 113–121. 19 indexed citations
7.
Gracia, Natalie, et al.. (2010). Addressing loneliness in a retirement village community: A pilot test of a print‐delivered intervention. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 29(4). 179–182. 14 indexed citations
8.
Moyle, Wendy, et al.. (2010). Acute care management of older people with dementia: a qualitative perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 20(3-4). 420–428. 126 indexed citations
9.
Barbour, Jennifer Patricia, Paula Brough, & Natalie Gracia. (2009). Job satisfaction, psychological strain and turnover intentions in Police Officers: the influence of organisation-specific measures of support. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026