Ian James

680 total citations
10 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Ian James is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ian James has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Ian James's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Ian James is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Ian James collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Italy. Ian James's co-authors include Clive Ballard, John T. O’Brien, Jane Fossey, Alan Swann, Katharina Reichelt, Lesley Lee, Elizabeta B. Mukaetova‐Ladinska, Ann Scott, Elizabeth A. Mitchell and Assumpta Ryan and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Technology Assessment, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Ian James

10 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Ian James

PMH

GHP

CP

SPS

SP

Phuong Leung United Kingdom

Inge Cantegreil‐Kallen France

Kévin Charras France

Ajit Shah United Kingdom

Renate Verkaik Netherlands

Pak Hei Benedito Chou Canada

Li‐Yu Tang Taiwan

Sue Watts United Kingdom

Patricia Heacock United States

Cyril Hazif‐Thomas France

Phuong Leung United Kingdom

Ian James

363 ×1.3

PMH

243 ×1.1

GHP

105 ×1.4

CP

62 ×1.3

SPS

40 ×0.9

SP

Citations per year, relative to Ian James Ian James (= 1×) peers Phuong Leung

Countries citing papers authored by Ian James

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian James

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian James. The network helps show where Ian James may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian James

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian James. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian James based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian James. Ian James is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Warmoth, Krystal, Sarah Morgan‐Trimmer, Aleksandra Kudlicka, et al.. (2020). Reflections on a personalized cognitive rehabilitation intervention: Experiences of people living with dementia and their carers participating in the GREAT trial. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 32(2). 268–286. 3 indexed citations

2.

Clare, Linda, Aleksandra Kudlicka, Jan R. Oyebode, et al.. (2019). Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer’s and related dementias: the GREAT RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 23(10). 1–242. 72 indexed citations

3.

James, Ian, et al.. (2016). Should we tell lies to people with dementia in their best interest? The views of Italian and English medical doctors. 1(134). 35–40. 2 indexed citations

4.

Mukaetova‐Ladinska, Elizabeta B., et al.. (2012). Introducing a Latin ballroom dance class to people with dementia living in care homes, benefits and concerns: A pilot study. Dementia. 12(5). 523–535. 41 indexed citations

5.

James, Ian. (2011). Understanding Behaviour in Dementia that Challenges: A Guide to Assessment and Treatment. 39 indexed citations

6.

Scott, Ann, Assumpta Ryan, Ian James, & Elizabeth A. Mitchell. (2010). Perceptions and implications of violence from care home residents with dementia: a review and commentary. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 6(2). 110–122. 38 indexed citations

7.

Ballard, Clive, Richard G. Brown, Jane Fossey, et al.. (2009). Brief Psychosocial Therapy for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer Disease (The CALM-AD Trial). American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 17(9). 726–733. 62 indexed citations

8.

James, Ian, et al.. (2003). Lying to residents: Can the truth sometimes be unhelpful for people with dementia?. 1(82). 26–28. 8 indexed citations

9.

Ballard, Clive, Ian Powell, Ian James, et al.. (2002). Can psychiatric liaison reduce neuroleptic use and reduce health service utilization for dementia patients residing in care facilities. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 17(2). 140–145. 44 indexed citations

10.

Ballard, Clive, John T. O’Brien, Ian James, et al.. (2001). Quality of Life for People With Dementia Living in Residential and Nursing Home Care: The Impact of Performance on Activities of Daily Living, Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms, Language Skills, and Psychotropic Drugs. International Psychogeriatrics. 13(1). 93–106. 140 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact