Natalie A. Wyer
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey W. ShermanSteven J. StroessnerJeffrey L. KiblerJim BlascovichSabine PahlKimberley Caroline SchenkeTimothy J. PerfectStanley B. Klein
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (16 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPLoS ONEPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Natalie A. Wyer
29 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Sociology and Political Science 345
- Social Psychology 258
- Cognitive Neuroscience 188
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
- Applied Psychology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie A. Wyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie A. Wyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie A. Wyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie A. Wyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie A. Wyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie A. Wyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie A. Wyer. The network helps show where Natalie A. Wyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie A. Wyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie A. Wyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie A. Wyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie A. Wyer. Natalie A. Wyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 96 |
About Natalie A. Wyer
Natalie A. Wyer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (16 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (72 citations), Social Psychology (258 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (188 citations). Natalie A. Wyer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey W. Sherman, Steven J. Stroessner, Jeffrey L. Kibler, Jim Blascovich, Sabine Pahl, Kimberley Caroline Schenke, Timothy J. Perfect, Stanley B. Klein, Patric Bach and Charles M. Judd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.