Natalia Wege
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Johannés SiegristMorten WahrendorfPeter AngererJian LiSusanne MoebusThomas MuthNico DraganoKarl‐Heinz Jöckel
- Topics
- Workplace Health and Well-being (15 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers)Stress and Burnout Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Affective DisordersInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBMC Public Health
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Natalia Wege
28 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- General Health Professions 749
- Social Psychology 258
- Clinical Psychology 172
- Psychiatry and Mental health 126
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 119
Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Wege
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Wege's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Wege with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Wege more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Wege
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Wege. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Wege. The network helps show where Natalia Wege may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Wege
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Wege. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Wege based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Wege. Natalia Wege is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 78 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 95 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | 428 | |
| 20 | 114 |
About Natalia Wege
Natalia Wege is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers) and Stress and Burnout Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (749 citations), Health (114 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (68 citations). Natalia Wege has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Johannés Siegrist, Morten Wahrendorf, Peter Angerer, Jian Li, Susanne Moebus, Thomas Muth, Nico Dragano, Karl‐Heinz Jöckel, Raimund Erbel and Andreas Stang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.