Natalia Wege

38 total papers · 1.6k total citations
29 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Natalia Wege is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalia Wege has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalia Wege's work include Workplace Health and Well-being (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers) and Stress and Burnout Research (5 papers). Natalia Wege is often cited by papers focused on Workplace Health and Well-being (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers) and Stress and Burnout Research (5 papers). Natalia Wege collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Natalia Wege's co-authors include Johannés Siegrist, Morten Wahrendorf, Peter Angerer, Jian Li, Susanne Moebus, Thomas Muth, Karl‐Heinz Jöckel, Nico Dragano, Andreas Stang and Raimund Erbel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Natalia Wege

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalia Wege 745 256 172 125 118 29 1.1k
Ulla Peterson 832 1.1× 287 1.1× 266 1.5× 71 0.6× 80 0.7× 17 1.2k
Olga Evans 554 0.7× 280 1.1× 248 1.4× 96 0.8× 130 1.1× 21 1.4k
Ellen Melbye Langballe 521 0.7× 329 1.3× 202 1.2× 239 1.9× 152 1.3× 51 1.3k
Niels Kristian Rasmussen 402 0.5× 247 1.0× 283 1.6× 122 1.0× 131 1.1× 19 1.3k
Ellen Ek 425 0.6× 233 0.9× 266 1.5× 51 0.4× 206 1.7× 24 1.1k
Peppiina Saastamoinen 750 1.0× 154 0.6× 64 0.4× 129 1.0× 119 1.0× 28 1.2k
Anna-Liisa Elo 411 0.6× 281 1.1× 212 1.2× 55 0.4× 53 0.4× 13 944
Jin Hui Joo 378 0.5× 179 0.7× 195 1.1× 175 1.4× 127 1.1× 40 1.2k
Mariah Snyder 466 0.6× 151 0.6× 274 1.6× 235 1.9× 170 1.4× 48 1.4k
Jaya Pinikahana 485 0.7× 232 0.9× 310 1.8× 285 2.3× 65 0.6× 28 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Wege

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Wege's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Wege with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Wege more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Wege

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Wege. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Wege. The network helps show where Natalia Wege may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Wege

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Wege. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Wege based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Wege. Natalia Wege is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026