Leonie Ascone

34 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Leonie Ascone
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 152
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • Clinical Psychology 166
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Social Psychology 102
Replace Zoé Van Dyck with:
Zoé Van Dyck Luxembourg
Catherine Bolton United Kingdom
A. Verrier France
Melissa Milanovic Canada
Jacob Ham United States
Ashish Mehta United States
Sabina Hulbert United Kingdom
Cindy Woolverton United States
Kathy Smolewska Canada
Margreet ten Have Netherlands
Leonie Ascone relative to Zoé Van Dyck Luxembourg Zoé Van Dyck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Zoé Van Dyck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leonie Ascone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonie Ascone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonie Ascone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonie Ascone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonie Ascone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonie Ascone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonie Ascone. The network helps show where Leonie Ascone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leonie Ascone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leonie Ascone Line = papers co-authored together Leonie Ascone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201654
2 201643
3 202240
4 201737
5 201724
6 201618
7 202118
8 201916
9 201816
10 202215
11 202213
12 201612
13 201812
14 202011
15 20209
16 20228
17 20207
18 20216
19 20226
20 20216

About Leonie Ascone

Leonie Ascone is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Applied Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (152 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (166 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations) and Social Psychology (102 citations). Leonie Ascone has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tania M. Lincoln, Edo S. Jaya, Simone Kühn, Björn Schlier, Steffen Moritz, Christian Koch, Jürgen Gallinat, Cynthia Olotu, Angela Scherwath and Jürgen Gallinat. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Environmental Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry and Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact