Natalia Meir
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sharon Armon-LotemJan de JongRama NovogrodskyJoel WaltersMaria PolinskyTanja KupischNatalia MitrofanovaMarit Westergaard
- Topics
- Language Development and Disorders (39 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (28 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in PsychologyBrain and Language
- Partner nations
- IsraelGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Natalia Meir
45 papers receiving 846 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 699
- Cognitive Neuroscience 480
- Linguistics and Language 147
- Language and Linguistics 126
- Education 72
Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Meir
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Meir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Meir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Meir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Meir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Meir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Meir. The network helps show where Natalia Meir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Meir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Meir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Meir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Meir. Natalia Meir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 145 |
About Natalia Meir
Natalia Meir is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 53 papers that have together received 860 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (39 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (28 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (699 citations), Linguistics and Language (147 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (480 citations). Natalia Meir has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Armon-Lotem, Jan de Jong, Rama Novogrodsky, Joel Walters, Maria Polinsky, Tanja Kupisch, Natalia Mitrofanova, Marit Westergaard, Yulia Rodina and Michal Ben‐Shachar. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Brain and Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.