Naomi Kodama

24 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Naomi Kodama
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Economics and Econometrics 102
  • Sociology and Political Science 66
  • Gender Studies 63
  • Strategy and Management 46
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36
Replace Rita K. Almeida with:
Rita K. Almeida United States
Titan Alon United States
Sonali Jain-Chandra United States
Nina Torm Denmark
Elaine Toldo Pazello Brazil
Peter T. Calcagno United States
Andreas Georgiadis United Kingdom
Yuka Sakurai Australia
Stefan Speckesser United Kingdom
John Grigsby United States
Naomi Kodama relative to Rita K. Almeida United States Rita K. Almeida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Rita K. Almeida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Kodama

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Kodama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Kodama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Kodama more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Kodama

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Kodama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Kodama. The network helps show where Naomi Kodama may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Kodama

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Kodama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Kodama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Kodama. Naomi Kodama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 5
3 3
4 3
5 26
6 9
7 0
8 14
9 32
10 1
11 37
12
Women in the Workplace and Management Practices: Theory and Evidence
2
13
Gender Difference of Managerial Careers among Japanese Firms: An Empirical Study Using Employer-Employee Matched Data
1
14 7
15
A Decomposition of the Decline in Japanese Nominal Wages in the 1990s and 2000s
4
16 4
17
Compilation of the Regional-Level Japan Industrial Productivity Database(R-JIP) and Analyses of Productivity Differences across Prefectures
2
18 4
19
Why does employing more females increase corporate profits?:evidence from japanese panel data
3
20
Effects of work-life balance programs on female employment
4

About Naomi Kodama

Naomi Kodama is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Public Administration, having authored 28 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (12 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (8 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (63 citations), Public Administration (16 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (36 citations). Naomi Kodama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Takao Kato, Mari Tanaka, Yukiko Abe, Beata Smarzynska Javorcik, Eunmi Mun, Tomohiko Inui, Donald Tomaskovic‐Devey, Dustin Avent‐Holt, Lasse Folke Henriksen and Jiwook Jung. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics and Applied Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026