Naomi Ellis
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Speech and Hearing top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher GidlowDiane CroneLynne JohnstonDavid JamesGemma HurstDaniel MastersonMark NieuwenhuijsenMargarita Triguero‐Mas
- Topics
- Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (15 papers)Urban Green Space and Health (11 papers)Noise Effects and Management (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Naomi Ellis
41 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 823
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 379
- Speech and Hearing 320
- Global and Planetary Change 251
- Physiology 250
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Ellis
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Ellis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Ellis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Ellis. The network helps show where Naomi Ellis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Ellis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Ellis. Naomi Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | Cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: video-stimulated recall interviews with practitioners | 10 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 74 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 108 | |
| 16 | 284 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Naomi Ellis
Naomi Ellis is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Applied Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (15 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (11 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (823 citations), Speech and Hearing (320 citations) and Transportation (201 citations). Naomi Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Gidlow, Diane Crone, Lynne Johnston, David James, Gemma Hurst, Daniel Masterson, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Margarita Triguero‐Mas, Jolanda Maas and Hanneke Kruize. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Environment International and Landscape and Urban Planning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.