Environment International

10.0k papers and 508.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.0k papers published in Environment International in the last decades have received a total of 508.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Environment International usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (5.9k papers), Pollution (2.5k papers) and Environmental Chemistry (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Air Quality and Health Impacts (2.7k papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (1.6k papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environment International are Rattan Lal, Guang‐Guo Ying, Ki‐Hyun Kim, Mehran Alaee, Adrian Covaci, Anushree Malik, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Ming Hung Wong, José L. Domingo and Ehsanul Kabir.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environment International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environment International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environment International.

Countries where authors publish in Environment International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environment International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environment International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environment International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025