Victoria Riley

582 total citations
20 papers, 379 citations indexed

About

Victoria Riley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Victoria Riley has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 379 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Victoria Riley's work include Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (12 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). Victoria Riley is often cited by papers focused on Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (12 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). Victoria Riley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Zimbabwe. Victoria Riley's co-authors include Naomi Ellis, Robert Goulden, Reynaldo Martina, Emmanuel Nsutebu, Christopher Gidlow, Sarah Grogan, Jennifer Taylor, David Clark‐Carter, Dennis F. Bandyk and Martin R. Back and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Journal of Vascular Surgery and Patient Education and Counseling.

In The Last Decade

Victoria Riley

18 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Victoria Riley United Kingdom 10 183 105 72 64 58 20 379
Joseph Chiovaro United States 6 183 1.0× 38 0.4× 66 0.9× 147 2.3× 42 0.7× 17 394
F Gardiner Australia 12 84 0.5× 74 0.7× 92 1.3× 38 0.6× 21 0.4× 54 423
Patrick G. Hughes United States 13 54 0.3× 89 0.8× 56 0.8× 88 1.4× 55 0.9× 70 448
Sri Ram Pentakota United States 13 94 0.5× 129 1.2× 48 0.7× 67 1.0× 47 0.8× 30 394
Wendy Watson United Kingdom 10 209 1.1× 49 0.5× 88 1.2× 227 3.5× 27 0.5× 17 629
Adrian Plunkett United Kingdom 12 89 0.5× 113 1.1× 64 0.9× 32 0.5× 57 1.0× 29 439
Monica S. Aswani United States 11 80 0.4× 84 0.8× 84 1.2× 34 0.5× 16 0.3× 23 375
Brandon C. Maughan United States 14 92 0.5× 250 2.4× 65 0.9× 110 1.7× 15 0.3× 29 546
Mark Murphy Ireland 11 99 0.5× 124 1.2× 138 1.9× 63 1.0× 22 0.4× 31 440
Eric G. Hamilton United States 8 171 0.9× 102 1.0× 184 2.6× 54 0.8× 49 0.8× 12 492

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Riley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Riley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Riley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Riley. The network helps show where Victoria Riley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Riley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Riley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Riley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Riley. Victoria Riley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Riley, Victoria, et al.. (2024). The digital prescription: A systematic review and meta-analysis of smartphone apps for blood pressure control. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 195. 105755–105755. 1 indexed citations
3.
Riley, Victoria, et al.. (2023). The Impact and Perception of England’s Web-Based Heart Age Test of Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Cardio. 7. e39097–e39097. 2 indexed citations
4.
Riley, Victoria, et al.. (2023). Building legal literacy in organisations that support people experiencing multiple disadvantage. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 45(1). 11–26.
5.
Riley, Victoria, Lisa Cowap, Naomi Ellis, et al.. (2022). Using social media for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research: The process and impact of a closed Facebook group. Health Expectations. 25(6). 2786–2795. 10 indexed citations
6.
7.
Riley, Victoria, et al.. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on women's pregnancy and postpartum experience in England: A qualitative exploration. Midwifery. 101. 103061–103061. 39 indexed citations
8.
Gidlow, Christopher, Naomi Ellis, Victoria Riley, et al.. (2021). Cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: video-stimulated recall interviews with practitioners. Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University). 10 indexed citations
9.
Gidlow, Christopher, Naomi Ellis, Lisa Cowap, et al.. (2021). Cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks using QRISK®2 and JBS3 risk calculators: the RICO qualitative and quantitative study. Health Technology Assessment. 25(50). 1–124. 11 indexed citations
10.
Forsyth, Jacky, et al.. (2021). Perceptions of Physical Activity Changes Due to COVID-19 Restrictions Among Women in the United Kingdom. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal. 29(2). 117–126. 4 indexed citations
11.
Gidlow, Christopher, Naomi Ellis, Lisa Cowap, et al.. (2020). Quantitative examination of video-recorded NHS Health Checks: comparison of the use of QRISK2 versus JBS3 cardiovascular risk calculators. BMJ Open. 10(9). e037790–e037790. 8 indexed citations
12.
Riley, Victoria, Naomi Ellis, Lisa Cowap, et al.. (2020). A qualitative exploration of two risk calculators using video-recorded NHS health check consultations. BMC Family Practice. 21(1). 250–250. 11 indexed citations
13.
Gidlow, Christopher, Naomi Ellis, Victoria Riley, et al.. (2019). Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations. BMC Public Health. 19(1). 224–224. 17 indexed citations
14.
15.
Riley, Victoria, et al.. (2019). Improving cardiovascular disease risk communication in the UK national health service health check programme. Patient Education and Counseling. 102(11). 2016–2023. 6 indexed citations
16.
Riley, Victoria, Christopher Gidlow, & Naomi Ellis. (2018). Understanding implementation and uptake in the National Health Service Health Check Programme. Public Health. 159. 63–66. 3 indexed citations
17.
Riley, Victoria, Christopher Gidlow, & Naomi Ellis. (2018). Uptake of NHS health check: issues in monitoring. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 20. e64–e64. 6 indexed citations
18.
Goulden, Robert, et al.. (2018). qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis. Emergency Medicine Journal. 35(6). 345–349. 176 indexed citations
19.
Drinkwater, Kenneth, Neil Dagnall, Sarah Grogan, & Victoria Riley. (2017). Understanding the unknown: A thematic analysis of subjective paranormal experiences. Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University). 17(1). 23. 20 indexed citations
20.
Back, Martin R., et al.. (1999). A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 30(3). 453–460. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026