Nancy M. Blaker

454 total citations
9 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

Nancy M. Blaker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy M. Blaker has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nancy M. Blaker's work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). Nancy M. Blaker is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). Nancy M. Blaker collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Nancy M. Blaker's co-authors include Mark van Vugt, Fiona Edgar, Channah Herschberg, Jing A. Zhang, Astrid C. Homan, Catrin Finkenauer, Marc W. Heerdink, Gerben A. van Kleef, André M. Everett and Brian R. Spisak and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Nancy M. Blaker

9 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nancy M. Blaker New Zealand 8 118 96 77 59 53 9 253
Inmaculada Adarves‐Yorno United Kingdom 8 130 1.1× 116 1.2× 141 1.8× 64 1.1× 24 0.5× 13 300
Lynne C. Vincent United States 9 95 0.8× 115 1.2× 134 1.7× 99 1.7× 88 1.7× 16 341
Rachel Lise Ruttan United States 9 94 0.8× 25 0.3× 103 1.3× 42 0.7× 68 1.3× 20 252
Ike Silver United States 9 132 1.1× 35 0.4× 88 1.1× 15 0.3× 72 1.4× 15 282
Deborah Son Holoien United States 6 207 1.8× 32 0.3× 120 1.6× 25 0.4× 23 0.4× 6 288
Thomas J. Flamson United States 5 87 0.7× 89 0.9× 133 1.7× 10 0.2× 70 1.3× 6 305
John Rijsman Netherlands 9 134 1.1× 32 0.3× 126 1.6× 60 1.0× 25 0.5× 19 277
Tina Urbach Germany 11 112 0.9× 38 0.4× 129 1.7× 231 3.9× 24 0.5× 14 345
Anna E. Clark Netherlands 9 254 2.2× 47 0.5× 148 1.9× 17 0.3× 20 0.4× 14 371
Emil G. Moldovan United States 3 139 1.2× 85 0.9× 42 0.5× 30 0.5× 20 0.4× 4 280

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy M. Blaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy M. Blaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy M. Blaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy M. Blaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy M. Blaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy M. Blaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy M. Blaker. The network helps show where Nancy M. Blaker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy M. Blaker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy M. Blaker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy M. Blaker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy M. Blaker. Nancy M. Blaker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Edgar, Fiona, Nancy M. Blaker, & André M. Everett. (2020). Gender and job performance: linking the high performance work system with the ability–motivation–opportunity framework. Personnel Review. 50(1). 47–63. 25 indexed citations
2.
Edgar, Fiona, Jing A. Zhang, & Nancy M. Blaker. (2020). The HPWS and AMO: a dynamic study of system- and individual-level effects. International Journal of Manpower. 42(5). 794–809. 29 indexed citations
3.
Blaker, Nancy M., Brian R. Spisak, Joshua M. Tybur, Michal Kandrik, & Richard D. Arvey. (2020). Cue masking and cultural signals: Testing context-specific preferences for bald(ing) leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 88. 103936–103936. 3 indexed citations
4.
Edgar, Fiona, Jing A. Zhang, & Nancy M. Blaker. (2019). AMO, High-Performance Work Systems and Employee Performance. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2019(1). 11358–11358. 8 indexed citations
5.
Blaker, Nancy M., et al.. (2018). The Napoleon Complex: When Shorter Men Take More. Psychological Science. 29(7). 1134–1144. 16 indexed citations
6.
Blaker, Nancy M., et al.. (2017). Size, skills, and suffrage: Motivated distortions in perceived formidability of political leaders. PLoS ONE. 12(12). e0188485–e0188485. 9 indexed citations
7.
Spisak, Brian R., et al.. (2014). A face for all seasons: Searching for context-specific leadership traits and discovering a general preference for perceived health. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 792–792. 20 indexed citations
8.
Blaker, Nancy M., et al.. (2013). The height leadership advantage in men and women: Testing evolutionary psychology predictions about the perceptions of tall leaders. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 16(1). 17–27. 100 indexed citations
9.
Kleef, Gerben A. van, Astrid C. Homan, Catrin Finkenauer, Nancy M. Blaker, & Marc W. Heerdink. (2012). Prosocial norm violations fuel power affordance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48(4). 937–942. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026