N. Pilpel

113 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

N. Pilpel
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Pharmaceutical Science 957
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 203
  • Analytical Chemistry 275
  • Food Science 380
  • Computational Mechanics 347
Replace J.T. Carstensen with:
J.T. Carstensen United States
John A. Hersey United States
Petteri Paronen Finland
M. Perrut France
R. F. Fedors United States
J E Carless United Kingdom
Akinobu OTSUKA Japan
Rodolfo Pinal United States
Klára Pintye‐Hódi Hungary
Dane O. Kildsig United States
N. Pilpel relative to J.T. Carstensen United States J.T. Carstensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
J.T. Carstensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Pilpel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Pilpel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Pilpel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Pilpel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Pilpel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Pilpel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Pilpel. The network helps show where N. Pilpel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside N. Pilpel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Pilpel Line = papers co-authored together N. Pilpel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196373
2 198862
3 198760
4 198456
5 198653
6 199053
7 196448
8 198546
9 197644
10 199142
11
The tensile strength and compression behaviour of lactose, four fatty acids, and their mixtures in relation to tableting.
197340
12 196639
13 197639
14 196437
15 198636
16 197232
17 198832
18 197231
19 196831
20 198331

About N. Pilpel

N. Pilpel is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, having authored 115 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (45 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (29 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (17 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (12 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (11 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (9 papers) and Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (957 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (203 citations), Analytical Chemistry (275 citations), Food Science (380 citations) and Computational Mechanics (347 citations). N. Pilpel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Oludele A. Itiola, Trevor Jones, P. York, S. Malamataris, Ioannis Nikolakakis, Leong Sing Wong, Steven C. Ingham, R.P. Enever, Muhammad Riaz and Dali Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Powder Technology, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact