N. Muttucumaru
- Plant Science top 2%
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Nigel G. HalfordDonald S. MottramJ. Stephen ElmoreStephen J. PowersTanya Y. CurtisM. A. J. ParryAndrew T. DodsonJ. Postles
- Topics
- Potato Plant Research (21 papers)Plant Pathogens and Resistance (11 papers)Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoSweden
In The Last Decade
N. Muttucumaru
25 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Food Science 924
- Molecular Biology 239
- Nutrition and Dietetics 107
- Organic Chemistry 45
Countries citing papers authored by N. Muttucumaru
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Muttucumaru's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Muttucumaru with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Muttucumaru more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Muttucumaru
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Muttucumaru. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Muttucumaru. The network helps show where N. Muttucumaru may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Muttucumaru
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Muttucumaru. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Muttucumaru based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Muttucumaru. N. Muttucumaru is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 75 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | Activity of enzymes associated with asparagine synthesis and breakdown in wheat under biotic and abiotic stress conditions | 3 |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 64 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 93 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 72 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | Genetic and environmental factors affecting asparagine concentration and acrylamide formation in wheat flour. | 1 |
| 18 | 104 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 131 |
About N. Muttucumaru
N. Muttucumaru is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Potato Plant Research (21 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (11 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (924 citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (107 citations). N. Muttucumaru has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Nigel G. Halford, Donald S. Mottram, J. Stephen Elmore, Stephen J. Powers, Tanya Y. Curtis, M. A. J. Parry, Andrew T. Dodson, J. Postles, Peter R. Shewry and J. Stephen Elmore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and Journal of Experimental Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.