Minja Kim Choe

3.7k total citations
84 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Minja Kim Choe is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Minja Kim Choe has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Gender Studies, 30 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 27 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Minja Kim Choe's work include Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (42 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (28 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (19 papers). Minja Kim Choe is often cited by papers focused on Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (42 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (28 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (19 papers). Minja Kim Choe collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Minja Kim Choe's co-authors include Robert D. Retherford, Ronald R. Rindfuss, Noriko O. Tsuya, Larry L. Bumpass, Fred Arnold, Tarun Kumar Roy, Shyam Thapa, Jiajian Chen, Vinod Mishra and Emi Tamaki and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Sociological Review and Technometrics.

In The Last Decade

Minja Kim Choe

82 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Minja Kim Choe United States 26 1.2k 919 912 857 453 84 2.5k
Robert D. Retherford United States 29 1.0k 0.8× 812 0.9× 913 1.0× 925 1.1× 457 1.0× 104 2.9k
John Hobcraft United Kingdom 24 761 0.6× 714 0.8× 824 0.9× 1.1k 1.2× 784 1.7× 59 2.9k
Caroline Bledsoe United States 26 694 0.6× 959 1.0× 467 0.5× 458 0.5× 417 0.9× 63 2.3k
Renata Forste United States 27 431 0.3× 867 0.9× 423 0.5× 441 0.5× 610 1.3× 46 2.5k
Jennifer S. Barber United States 34 973 0.8× 1.1k 1.2× 1.2k 1.3× 609 0.7× 732 1.6× 90 3.1k
William Butz United States 18 418 0.3× 249 0.3× 409 0.4× 324 0.4× 381 0.8× 52 1.4k
Hope Corman United States 27 352 0.3× 948 1.0× 197 0.2× 482 0.6× 853 1.9× 94 2.5k
Belinda Hewitt Australia 27 774 0.6× 1.2k 1.3× 597 0.7× 103 0.1× 523 1.2× 96 2.4k
Climent Quintana‐Domeque United Kingdom 19 295 0.2× 321 0.3× 247 0.3× 320 0.4× 385 0.8× 54 1.6k
Tina Miller United Kingdom 20 498 0.4× 1.3k 1.5× 249 0.3× 274 0.3× 830 1.8× 50 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Minja Kim Choe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minja Kim Choe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minja Kim Choe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minja Kim Choe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minja Kim Choe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minja Kim Choe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minja Kim Choe. The network helps show where Minja Kim Choe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Minja Kim Choe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Minja Kim Choe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Minja Kim Choe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Minja Kim Choe. Minja Kim Choe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rindfuss, Ronald R., Minja Kim Choe, & Sarah R. Brauner‐Otto. (2016). The Emergence of Two Distinct Fertility Regimes in Economically Advanced Countries. Population Research and Policy Review. 35(3). 287–304. 60 indexed citations
2.
Rindfuss, Ronald R., Minja Kim Choe, Feng Wang, et al.. (2015). Low and Lower Fertility: Variations across Developed Countries. Springer eBooks. 14 indexed citations
3.
Abbasi‐Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal, Alı́cia Adserà, Caroline Berghammer, et al.. (2014). Future Fertility in Low Fertility Countries World Population and Human Capital in the Twenty-First Century. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 40–147. 1 indexed citations
4.
Choe, Minja Kim, et al.. (2013). Socioeconomic Impacts of Demographic Change. 4 indexed citations
5.
Westley, Sidney B., Minja Kim Choe, & Robert D. Retherford. (2010). Very low fertility in Asia: is there a problem? Can it be solved?. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 1. 19 indexed citations
6.
Chen, Jiajian, et al.. (2009). Population Policy, Economic Reform, and Fertility Decline in Guangdong Province, China. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 1 indexed citations
7.
Chen, Jiajian, et al.. (2009). Effects of population policy and economic reform on the trend in fertility in Guangdong province, China, 1975–2005. Population Studies. 64(1). 43–60. 13 indexed citations
8.
Westley, Sidney B. & Minja Kim Choe. (2007). How does son preference affect populations in Asia. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 1. 13 indexed citations
9.
Choe, Minja Kim & Kyung‐Ae Park. (2006). Fertility Decline in South Korea: Forty Years of Policy-Behavior Dialogue. Rénkǒu xuékān. 29(2). 1–26. 18 indexed citations
10.
Retherford, Robert D., et al.. (2005). How Far Has Fertility in China Really Declined?. Population and Development Review. 31(1). 57–84. 76 indexed citations
11.
Choe, Minja Kim, Shyam Thapa, & Vinod Mishra. (2004). EARLY MARRIAGE AND EARLY MOTHERHOOD IN NEPAL. Journal of Biosocial Science. 37(2). 143–162. 103 indexed citations
12.
Choe, Minja Kim, et al.. (2001). Risk-taking behavior among high school students in South Korea. Journal of Adolescence. 24(4). 571–574. 20 indexed citations
13.
Choe, Minja Kim, et al.. (2001). Initiation of smoking, drinking, and drug-use among Filipino youths. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 29. 105–132. 5 indexed citations
14.
Choe, Minja Kim & Hui‐Sheng Lin. (2001). Effect of education on premarital sex and marriage in Taiwan. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 6 indexed citations
15.
Choe, Minja Kim, et al.. (1998). SON PREFERENCE AND FAMILY BUILDING DURING FERTILITY TRANSITION IMPLICATIONS ON CHILD SURVIVAL. 21(1). 184–228. 10 indexed citations
16.
Mason, Karen Oppenheim, Noriko O. Tsuya, & Minja Kim Choe. (1998). The changing family in comparative perspective: Asia and the United States. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 46 indexed citations
17.
Choe, Minja Kim, et al.. (1998). Wanted and unwanted fertility in selected states of India. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 8 indexed citations
18.
Choe, Minja Kim, et al.. (1992). Progression to Second and Third Births in China: Patterns and Covariates in Six Provinces. International Family Planning Perspectives. 18(4). 130–130. 10 indexed citations
19.
Choe, Minja Kim & Noriko O. Tsuya. (1991). Why do Chinese women practice contraception? The case of rural Jilin Province.. PubMed. 22(1). 39–51. 15 indexed citations
20.
Westoff, Charles F., Noreen Goldman, & Minja Kim Choe. (1980). Prevalence and demographic significance of contraceptive sterilization in Fiji, the Republic of Korea, and Sri Lanka. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026