Stuart Gietel‐Basten
- Demography top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Quanbao JiangSergei ScherbovTomáš FrejkaGeorgia VerropoulouAnna RotkirchWolfgang LutzMaria TestaDavid Coleman
- Topics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (42 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (34 papers)Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (25 papers)
- Cited by
- Gender StudiesDemographyHealth
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Stuart Gietel‐Basten
84 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Demography 574
- Sociology and Political Science 473
- Gender Studies 471
- General Health Professions 247
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 176
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Gietel‐Basten
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Gietel‐Basten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Gietel‐Basten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Gietel‐Basten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Gietel‐Basten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Gietel‐Basten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Gietel‐Basten. The network helps show where Stuart Gietel‐Basten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Gietel‐Basten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Gietel‐Basten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Gietel‐Basten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Gietel‐Basten. Stuart Gietel‐Basten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | RATIONAL PERSUASION, COERCION OR MANIPULATION? THE ROLE OF ABORTION IN CHINA´S FAMILY PLANNING POLICIES | 1 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | Have lifetime fertility intentions declined during the Great Recession | 8 |
About Stuart Gietel‐Basten
Stuart Gietel‐Basten is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Demography and Health, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (42 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (34 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (471 citations), Demography (574 citations) and Health (99 citations). Stuart Gietel‐Basten has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Quanbao Jiang, Sergei Scherbov, Tomáš Frejka, Georgia Verropoulou, Anna Rotkirch, Wolfgang Lutz, Maria Testa, David Coleman, Francesco C. Billari and Anneli Miettinen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.