Ming-Hsien Tu

43 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers

Ming-Hsien Tu
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 270
  • Geometry and Topology 176
  • Hardware and Architecture 77
  • Computational Mathematics 5
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 376
Replace Zoë Holmes with:
Zoë Holmes United States
Yu. B. Suris Germany
Muhammad Shoaib Saleem Pakistan
Peter Doubilet United States
Jiao Wei China
Mustapha Rachidi Morocco
Martín Larocca United States
Michael Newman United States
Tyler Volkoff United States
Luis Verde‐Star Mexico
Ming-Hsien Tu relative to Zoë Holmes United States Zoë Holmes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.6×
Zoë Holmes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Hsien Tu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Hsien Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Hsien Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Hsien Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Hsien Tu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Hsien Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Hsien Tu. The network helps show where Ming-Hsien Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Hsien Tu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Hsien Tu Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Hsien Tu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012147
2 2010110
3 201142
4 199739
5 201429
6 199726
7 200022
8 199919
9 201119
10 201718
11 201317
12 199917
13 200313
14 201012
15 200011
16 200910
17 20129
18 19999
19 20039
20 20118

About Ming-Hsien Tu

Ming-Hsien Tu is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Algebra and Number Theory and Spectroscopy, having authored 47 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (31 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (24 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (16 papers), Low-power high-performance VLSI design (13 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (9 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (9 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (7 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (270 citations), Geometry and Topology (176 citations), Hardware and Architecture (77 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (376 citations). Ming-Hsien Tu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shyh‐Jye Jou, Ching-Te Chuang, Ming-Chien Tsai, Wei-Chiang Shih, Ling-Lie Chau, Ching-Te Chuang, Yaping Wu, Wei Hwang, Junkai Zhao and Chung-Ping Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Letters in Mathematical Physics, Physics Letters A, International Journal of Modern Physics A, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers and Journal of Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact