Letters in Mathematical Physics

4.0k papers and 57.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Letters in Mathematical Physics in the last decades have received a total of 57.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Letters in Mathematical Physics usually cover Mathematical Physics (1.9k papers), Geometry and Topology (1.7k papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (1.4k papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (1.1k papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Letters in Mathematical Physics are Michio Jimbo, Maxim Kontsevich, Nicolai Reshetikhin, P. P. Kulish, Yuji Tachikawa, Luis F. Alday, L. D. Faddeev, Albert Schwarz, Rinat Kashaev and Davide Gaiotto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Letters in Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Letters in Mathematical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Letters in Mathematical Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Letters in Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Letters in Mathematical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Letters in Mathematical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Letters in Mathematical Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025