Ming‐Hong Hsieh
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Te‐Jen LaiChun‐Te LeeJames R. MacFallDavid C. SteffensMartha E. PayneRobert M. LevyDouglas R. McQuoidVincent Chin‐Hung Chen
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers)Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers)Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBehavioural Brain Research
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ming‐Hong Hsieh
32 papers receiving 436 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 93
- Cognitive Neuroscience 91
- Clinical Psychology 85
- Health 63
- Social Psychology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Hong Hsieh
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Hong Hsieh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Hong Hsieh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Hong Hsieh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Hong Hsieh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Hong Hsieh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Hong Hsieh. The network helps show where Ming‐Hong Hsieh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming‐Hong Hsieh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming‐Hong Hsieh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming‐Hong Hsieh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming‐Hong Hsieh. Ming‐Hong Hsieh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 92 |
About Ming‐Hong Hsieh
Ming‐Hong Hsieh is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers) and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (41 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations) and Health (63 citations). Ming‐Hong Hsieh has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Te‐Jen Lai, Chun‐Te Lee, James R. MacFall, David C. Steffens, Martha E. Payne, Robert M. Levy, Douglas R. McQuoid, Vincent Chin‐Hung Chen, Meng‐Chih Lee and Chi‐Hua Yen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Behavioural Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.