Chih‐Li Lin

87 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Chih‐Li Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Biochemistry 371
  • Biological Psychiatry 115
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 133
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 567
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 61
Replace Marina Sánchéz‐Hidalgo with:
Marina Sánchéz‐Hidalgo Spain
Sajad Fakhri Iran
Yoshichika Kawai Japan
Izabela Sadowska‐Bartosz Poland
Nurulain T. Zaveri United States
Lydia Reznichenko Israel
Anguo Wu China
Gil‐Saeng Jeong South Korea
Altaf S. Darvesh United States
Chih‐Li Lin relative to Marina Sánchéz‐Hidalgo Spain Marina Sánchéz‐Hidalgo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Marina Sánchéz‐Hidalgo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Li Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Li Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Li Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Li Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Li Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Li Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Li Lin. The network helps show where Chih‐Li Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih‐Li Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih‐Li Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chih‐Li Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998221
2 2007163
3 2008132
4 2008126
5 2001109
6 2015109
7 201599
8 201375
9 201764
10 201163
11 200762
12 201560
13 202152
14 201052
15 200949
16 201545
17 201744
18 201643
19 200842
20 201039

About Chih‐Li Lin

Chih‐Li Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (19 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (10 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (9 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (8 papers) and Tea Polyphenols and Effects (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (371 citations), Biological Psychiatry (115 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (133 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (567 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (61 citations). Chih‐Li Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jen‐Kun Lin, Hsiu‐Chen Huang, Jen‐Kun Lin, Chien‐Ning Huang, Hsin‐Hua Li, Yu‐Chih Liang, Wei J. Chen, Chiung‐Huei Peng, I-Ming Juan and Shoei‐Yn Lin‐Shiau. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, PLoS ONE, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Behavioural Brain Research and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact