Anna McCarrey

1.9k total citations
8 papers, 554 citations indexed

About

Anna McCarrey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna McCarrey has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 554 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Anna McCarrey's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). Anna McCarrey is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). Anna McCarrey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Anna McCarrey's co-authors include Susan M. Resnick, Yang An, Luigi Ferrucci, Melissa Kitner‐Triolo, Julie D. Henry, Fiona Summers, Clare L. Scott, Louise H. Phillips, Jeehoon Kim and Tara L. Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Neurobiology of Aging.

In The Last Decade

Anna McCarrey

8 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna McCarrey United States	8	163	131	72	67	60	8	554
Teresa Costa Castanho Portugal	13	144 0.9×	143 1.1×	62 0.9×	61 0.9×	13 0.2×	30	544
Carlos Portugal‐Nunes Portugal	12	70 0.4×	145 1.1×	67 0.9×	68 1.0×	11 0.2×	29	445
Gilda E. Ennis United States	11	67 0.4×	129 1.0×	72 1.0×	72 1.1×	125 2.1×	26	498
Rowena Gomez United States	15	168 1.0×	239 1.8×	121 1.7×	45 0.7×	12 0.2×	33	846
Chantal Meslin Australia	14	281 1.7×	214 1.6×	71 1.0×	113 1.7×	12 0.2×	27	652
Krister Håkansson Sweden	14	339 2.1×	157 1.2×	69 1.0×	129 1.9×	64 1.1×	21	880
Zeliha Tunca Türkiye	17	566 3.5×	269 2.1×	85 1.2×	39 0.6×	24 0.4×	43	1.0k
Edmond Chiu Australia	17	254 1.6×	174 1.3×	42 0.6×	83 1.2×	17 0.3×	31	967
Laiss Bertola Brazil	15	253 1.6×	151 1.2×	58 0.8×	96 1.4×	28 0.5×	57	679
Brian Lawlor Ireland	12	291 1.8×	142 1.1×	32 0.4×	284 4.2×	38 0.6×	37	955

Countries citing papers authored by Anna McCarrey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna McCarrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna McCarrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna McCarrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna McCarrey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna McCarrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna McCarrey. The network helps show where Anna McCarrey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna McCarrey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna McCarrey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna McCarrey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna McCarrey. Anna McCarrey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Kim, Jeehoon, et al.. (2020). Positive, but Not Negative, Self-Perceptions of Aging Predict Cognitive Function Among Older Adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 93(1). 543–561. 29 indexed citations

2.

McCarrey, Anna, et al.. (2018). Age-related differences in striatal, medial temporal, and frontal involvement during value-based decision processing. Neurobiology of Aging. 69. 185–198. 13 indexed citations

3.

McCarrey, Anna, Yang An, Melissa Kitner‐Triolo, Luigi Ferrucci, & Susan M. Resnick. (2016). Sex differences in cognitive trajectories in clinically normal older adults.. Psychology and Aging. 31(2). 166–175. 320 indexed citations

4.

Goh, Joshua Oon Soo, et al.. (2016). Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(49). 12498–12509. 21 indexed citations

5.

McCarrey, Anna & Susan M. Resnick. (2015). Postmenopausal hormone therapy and cognition. Hormones and Behavior. 74. 167–172. 73 indexed citations

6.

McCarrey, Anna, Jennifer Pacheco, Olga D. Carlson, et al.. (2014). Interleukin-6 is linked to longitudinal rates of cortical thinning in aging. Translational Neuroscience. 5(1). 1–7. 35 indexed citations

7.

McCarrey, Anna, Julie D. Henry, William von Hippel, et al.. (2012). Age Differences in Neural Activity during Slot Machine Gambling: An fMRI Study. PLoS ONE. 7(11). e49787–e49787. 14 indexed citations

8.

Phillips, Louise H., et al.. (2008). Attentional lapses, emotional regulation and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 48(1). 101–106. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact