Min Ju

23 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Min Ju
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Strategy and Management 351
  • Business and International Management 32
  • Management Information Systems 93
  • Accounting 107
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 92
Replace Sherine Farouk with:
Sherine Farouk United Arab Emirates
Bao Wu China
Silvia Avasilcăi Romania
Shanyue Jin South Korea
John R. McIntyre United States
Alejandro Flores Peru
Birthe Soppe Norway
Na Ni China
Inês Pinto Portugal
Min Ju relative to Sherine Farouk United Arab Emirates Sherine Farouk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Sherine Farouk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min Ju

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min Ju's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min Ju with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min Ju more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min Ju

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min Ju. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min Ju. The network helps show where Min Ju may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Min Ju, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min Ju Line = papers co-authored together Min Ju links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009103
2 201489
3 201669
4 201451
5 201342
6 201840
7 201036
8 201735
9 202029
10 201228
11 202326
12 202226
13 202123
14 201916
15 201515
16 20209
17 20238
18 20225
19 20135
20 20225

About Min Ju

Min Ju is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Environmental Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (11 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (4 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (4 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (351 citations), Business and International Management (32 citations), Management Information Systems (93 citations), Accounting (107 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (92 citations). Min Ju has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Hongxin Zhao, Gerald Yong Gao, Kevin Zheng Zhou, Maggie Chuoyan Dong, Yulin Fang, Janet Y. Murray, Junsong Jia, Tiedong Wang, Masaaki Kotabe and Jason Lu Jin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Marketing, Journal of World Business, Energies, International Marketing Review and Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact